Am I reading this correctly if it's aboput $130 for a full logo contest
including the rights for use ?
If we can formulate some decent requirement specification, coughing up the
money should be the least of our problems.
Does the feather have to stay in its original shape/form? Is the logo
requir
Could a PCM add the fresh releases
shared/maven-jarsigner-1.3
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/maven/shared/maven-jarsigner/1.3/maven-jarsigner-1.3-source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/maven/shared/maven-ja
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Hervé BOUTEMY, Olivier Lamy, Benson Margulies
+1 (non binding): Tony CHEMIT
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
--
Tony Chemit
tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
http://www.codelutin.com
email: che...@c
+1 binding, it looks oK here.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1
>
> On 29 December 2013 09:01, Tony Chemit wrote:
>> Maven shared JarSigner 1.3
>> --
>>
>> The version 1.3 just fix an important bug while unsigning jar.
>>
>> We solved 1 issues:
>> h
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 23:01:43 +0100
Tony Chemit wrote:
Need one more binding vote, please :)
tony.
> Maven shared JarSigner 1.3
> --
>
> The version 1.3 just fix an important bug while unsigning jar.
>
> We solved 1 issues:
> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote
My suggestion is for someone in the PMC to pay $29 to
http://www.48hourslogo.com/ and have an extraordinary number of artists
show you their logo ideas. Buy the one you like and then donate it to
Apache.
Paul
Nice... I like the first one for compactness too!
On Thursday, 2 January 2014, Adam Retter wrote:
> Okay, so I bit the bullet and tried it. I based my examples on a
> Creative Commons image, but it should be fine as long as it is
> attributed. http://www.flickr.com/photos/dr_scott/4463167753/size
Well our current "icon" is somebody's arse behind a laptop... Which with a
cleaner site looks a tad odd
With the old header bar it was fine though
I have no issue changing the font or colouring, but I think an actual icon
or emblem is something good to have.
There was some effort to pick a new f
Github user skabashnyuk closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/29
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Is it me or are a lot of these purely changing the icon, not the "logo".
i.e. is the "logo" inclusive of the "mAven" name ( side question - why is the A
always a different colour, historic Ant reference? )
On 3 Jan 2014, at 2:18, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> As 9 is particularly problematic I have
I personally liked the anteater idea... We can ask the Ant PMC if we have a
"winning" logo that we are worried about
On Thursday, 2 January 2014, Robert Scholte wrote:
> How "safe" is an aardvark or armadillo compared to an AntEater?
>
> https://www.google.com/search?q=creative+animal&hl=nl&;
> s
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): bimargulies, Stephen Connolly, Robert Scholte
+1 (non binding): Dan Beaulieu
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
How "safe" is an aardvark or armadillo compared to an AntEater?
https://www.google.com/search?q=creative+animal&hl=nl&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=uKnFUsCFBKGK0AWR6YHADQ&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1858&bih=934#hl=nl&q=aardvark&tbm=isch&tbs=itp:clipart
Op Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:52:57 +0100 schreef Stephen
So what... you cannot do worse than
http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven.png
On 2 January 2014 16:55, Adam Retter wrote:
> I would love to, but I posses absolutely zero artistic skill.
>
> On 2 January 2014 16:28, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
> > how about you try sketching
FYI: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-408
Op Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:46:31 +0100 schreef Robert Scholte
:
wagon-2.5 has exactly the same errors, which means it is not a
regression.
So this release hasn't become worse.
I'll create a JIRA issue, so we can track these errors.
+1
Robert
O
wagon-2.5 has exactly the same errors, which means it is not a regression.
So this release hasn't become worse.
I'll create a JIRA issue, so we can track these errors.
+1
Robert
Op Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:21:00 +0100 schreef Robert Scholte
:
[INFO]
how about you try sketching out what you mean!
On 2 January 2014 16:18, Adam Retter wrote:
> I like that one best personally. How about something like the Albanian
> coat of arms?
>
> On 2 January 2014 15:11, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
> > http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/m
how about you try sketching out what you mean!
On 2 January 2014 16:18, Adam Retter wrote:
> I like that one best personally. How about something like the Albanian
> coat of arms?
>
> On 2 January 2014 15:11, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
> > http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/m
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Maven Wagon SUCCESS [6.707s]
[INFO] Apache Maven Wagon :: API . SUCCESS
[11.835s]
[INFO] Apache Maven Wagon ::
Well I am a big fan of my moose with the internet on tap... only benson was
against the moose from what I heard...
However, I will do a vote-off once we get some other suggestions so that
the community can decide
On 2 January 2014 15:47, Baptiste Mathus wrote:
> Might be just me, but though I'
Oups, forgot users list.
Might be just me, but though I'm not against using a raven, I'd at least
prefer the more friendly 13 one (see
http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/screenshot-13.png).
I'm actually far more liking the friendly teddybear's style of the moose (
http://people.
Might be just me, but though I'm not against using a raven, I'd at least
prefer the more friendly 13 one (see
http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/screenshot-13.png).
I'm actually far more liking the friendly teddybear's style of the moose (
http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven
http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven-15.png
On 2 January 2014 14:52, Lyons, Roy wrote:
> I was wondering if you might be able to try this with the bird flying
> upwards and to the right. Its a "moving up and to the future" instead of
> "diving down into the past" kind of
Here is the testing I performed:
1. Checksum matches
2. All files in tag are present in source release (excepting DEPENDENCIES,
LICENSE and NOTICE)
3. Builds from source release
4. RAT report: compliance has not deteriorated.
On the above basis
+1 binding from me
-Stephen
On 30 December 2013
That wagon release is out there to help a user, and awaits two PMC members.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
As 9 is particularly problematic I have sketched -14 which is not a direct
copy of a silhouette. This still has the issue w.r.t. other marks called
maven using a silhouetted raven...
http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven-14.png (in
context:
http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/
two more that I drew over the holidays:
http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven-12.png (in
context:
http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/screenshot-12.png)
http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven-13.png (in
context:
http://people.apache.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
