Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread Aldrin Leal
There's a great comprehensive list at http://staticsitegenerators.net (btw, I've wrote the jbake-maven-plugin, for jbake - https://github.com/jonbullock/JBake) -- -- Aldrin Leal, Master your EC2-fu! Get the latest ekaterminal public beta http://www.ingenieux.com.br/products/ekaterminal/ On Sun

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
Here's a pretty good list of tools. The other two I've tried are Marked (which is another MAC app), but I've also tried dillinger.io which is web-based editor and it's quite good. There are quite a few web-based tools that provide similar capabilities to Mou. http://mashable.com/2013/06/24/mark

RE: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread Tanveer Ahmad
Please remove me from mailing list Tanveer Ahmad Lecturer, School of Technology St Patricks International College 48 Carey Street New Court London WC2A 2JE United Kingdom www.st-patricks.ac.uk From: sebb Sent: 06 October 2013 13:16 To: Maven Developers

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread sebb
Regarding automatic conversion to Markdown: The main ASF site was converted from xdoc to Markdown. Some tools werr written for this, but they were not 100% accurate; we were still finding conversion issues a year or so later. [We've probably not found them all yet] Whether these conversion issues

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
FML is used in a few places, not only main sites [1] but plugins and components too [2] So perhaps FML will remain until we find some macro tooling. I prefer keeping FML than maintaing index by hand If we can replace apt and xdoc, that will already be a good step Regards, Hervé [1] http://mav

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
ok for the rationale Markdown seems to have been chosen in Apache CMS too [1] DOXIA-472 is a show stopper IMHO for the moment: I hope someone will fix it Stephen wrote about asciidoc, but it is not supported by Doxia at the moment [2], so not an option until someone adds this format to Doxia For

Re: Maven Core moving to 1.6

2013-10-06 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Yep, +1 for 3.2 and onward. S. On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Given the vote we had about releases after September does anyone mind if I > update the source/target levels to 1.6 for the core? > > Thanks, > > Jason > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
2013/10/6 Stephen Connolly : >> IMHO >> >> Betamax == AsciiDoc >> VHS == MarkDown Being a bunch of old geezers, we all know which was technically superior. I had to teach my oldest kid how to operate a non-mobile phone the other day (she dialled number before lifting the handset) Kristian -

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Oct 6, 2013, at 3:13 AM, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: > Hello there, > > just my 2 cents: > > * I do not understand what is that bad about xdoc which is almost HTML. And > having a XSD/DTD code completion is available. > It's not bad, per se. It's really about the prevalence of good editors.

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread Stephen Connolly
Sent from my iPhone > On 6 Oct 2013, at 08:44, Stephen Connolly > wrote: > > > >> On Sunday, 6 October 2013, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: >> Hello there, >> >> just my 2 cents: >> >> * I do not understand what is that bad about xdoc which is almost HTML. And >> having a XSD/DTD code completi

[DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Sunday, 6 October 2013, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: > Hello there, > > just my 2 cents: > > * I do not understand what is that bad about xdoc which is almost HTML. And > having a XSD/DTD code completion is available. It's ugly (remember beauty is in the eye of the beholder) > > * *All* freest

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting site documentation to Markdown

2013-10-06 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello there, just my 2 cents: * I do not understand what is that bad about xdoc which is almost HTML. And having a XSD/DTD code completion is available. * *All* freestyle markup languages are ugly and hard to remember (I have to use TWiki/FosWiki and JIRA inhouse) * So getting rid of APT looks