+1 for 1.6 un master (3.2?)
If necessary we'll create a 3.1.x branch from 3.1.1 to process bug fixes.
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Given the vote we had about releases after September does anyone mind if I
> update the source/target le
Given the vote we had about releases after September does anyone mind if I
update the source/target levels to 1.6 for the core?
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
--
Couldn't have done it without the Fredalizer.
On Oct 4, 2013, at 8:40 PM, Fred Cooke wrote:
> Congratulations, Jason! :-)
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The Apache Maven Team is pleased to announce the release of 3.1.1
>>
>> The release notes can
Congratulations, Jason! :-)
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The Apache Maven Team is pleased to announce the release of 3.1.1
>
> The release notes can be found here:
> http://maven.apache.org/docs/3.1.1/release-notes.html
>
> The release can be downloaded from:
Hi!
The Apache Maven Team is pleased to announce the release of 3.1.1
The release notes can be found here:
http://maven.apache.org/docs/3.1.1/release-notes.html
The release can be downloaded from:
http://maven.apache.org/download.cgi
The changes in this release are as follows:
Bug:
[MNG-5459]
Good point. I did some experiments with the version:set plugin and I can live
with the rollback using that. So I reset the poms to 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT. Problem
solved.
On Oct 4, 2013, at 7:18 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
> Practical question. What should be supported maven version range for new
> ITs
true, having this version during development does not permit core its range as
usual: an IT for a minor version will be run only at release time, but not
before and after
that's a major issue, IMHO
Regards,
Hervé
Le vendredi 4 octobre 2013 07:18:50 Igor Fedorenko a écrit :
> Practical questio
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Kristian Rosenvold, Robert Scholte, Hervé Boutemy, Wayne Fay,
Jason van Zyl
+1: Fred Cook (Fredalizer), Tamás Cservenák, Mark Derricutt
I'll promote the artifacts and publish the site.
On Sep 17, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote
Practical question. What should be supported maven version range for new
ITs introduced during 3.1.2 development, [3.1,)? This means we'd need to
tag ITs, right? Otherwise it wouldn't be possible to successfully rerun
ITs for 3.1 and 3.1.1, unless I am mistaken.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 2013-09-14 1:
