On 9 September 2013 20:56, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> On 8 September 2013 18:51, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2013, at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> > I thought you were going to include the SCM coordinates used to create
>> > the tarballs?
>> >
>>
>> Sorry, not intentional. I forgot.
>>
>
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5181 ... The use of the MAVEN_OPTS flag
has resolved this issue for us. However now it is telling us that
maven-clean-plugin 2.5 cannot be found in our release repository. This might be
an ancillary issue as we have not encountered this before until I used th
On 8 September 2013 18:51, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2013, at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > I thought you were going to include the SCM coordinates used to create
> > the tarballs?
> >
>
> Sorry, not intentional. I forgot.
>
> > It's particularly important here, because AFAICT the SCM coor
+1 (non-binding) - tested releases against our OSGi based setup using
maven-bundle-plugin, my own coffeescript mojos and others.
Nothing glaringly out of order for me.
--
Mark Derricutt — twitter — podcast — blog — google+
On 9/09/2013, at 1:07 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Here is a link to Jir
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Robert Scholte, Olivier Lamy, Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 (non binding):
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
thanks,
Robert
Op Mon, 09 Sep 2013 19:47:09 +0200 schreef Hervé BOUTEMY
:
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le vendredi 6 se
Awesome, thanks.
On Sep 9, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), tested with extra-enforcer-rules, testlink-junit and
> jenkinsci-jobConfigHistory-plugin.
> Regards Mirko
> --
> http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/
> https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/
> https://bit
+1 (non-binding), tested with extra-enforcer-rules, testlink-junit and
jenkinsci-jobConfigHistory-plugin.
Regards Mirko
--
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/
https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/
https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
Still repro's in Maven 3.1. The bug says it is fixed there if I am reading it
correctly. However, the artifact is stored in Nexus in exactly where we want
it: 3rdparty. Maven pulls it down, and rather than acknowledge it's existence
in the local .m2 repository, it continues to try and find it an
Olivier and all,
sorry, I'm not really a member of the maven dev team - so I wanted to ask what
the options could be to make some progress on this
or if you feel that the jgit scm-provider should rather be hosted somewhere
else then @ASF?
So far it looks like the tests just fail on one single ins
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:29 AM, John Dix wrote:
> Still repro's in Maven 3.1. The bug says it is fixed there if I am reading
> it correctly. However, the artifact is stored in Nexus in exactly where we
> want it: 3rdparty. Maven pulls it down, and rather than acknowledge it's
> existence in the
I am deleting the .m2/repository (rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/*) before every build.
I have used the -U before as well.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Scholte [mailto:rfscho...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 10:41 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Failure to find artifa
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le vendredi 6 septembre 2013 21:35:56 Robert Scholte a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?styleName=Html&projectId=11
> 136&version=18760
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secu
Well, it is actually not a bug, but a more strict behavior of Maven 3
compared to Maven 2.
The issue is a solution to get the Maven 2 behavior with Maven 3.
In short: Maven 3 tries to predict if the project can still be built with
an empty repository, even if the dependencies are available in
Thanks!
The problem is not that I am not getting the artifact because I am. The problem
is that Maven acts like it doesn't have the file(after downloading it) and then
exits. If I rerun the build it passes just fine. It does this on very specific
artifacts every time. It is very reproducible. W
In that case you're probably hitting
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5181
Robert
Op Mon, 09 Sep 2013 18:57:25 +0200 schreef John Dix :
What I mean by being "downloaded" is that it is easily found in the
local .m2 repository of the machine maven is being executed on.
-Original Mes
What I mean by being "downloaded" is that it is easily found in the local .m2
repository of the machine maven is being executed on.
-Original Message-
From: John Dix
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 9:44 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: Failure to find artifact in Nexus
Thanks!
16 matches
Mail list logo