maven-plugin-tools pull request: MPLUGIN-244 Help mojo generates Javadoc, w...

GitHub user muminc opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-tools/pull/2 MPLUGIN-244 Help mojo generates Javadoc, which is not accepted by JDK 8... The close tag is causing Java 8 doclint to fail. Stackoverflow http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13720

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

On 29 July 2013 17:18, Jason van Zyl wrote: > I was referring to the remote resources plugin which is associated with the > 3.1.1 release. > > I have not attempted to release 3.1.1 and I have not sent out any release > vote. I do intend to add what Sebb suggested by adding the revision. Thanks

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

Well, I am known for my big heart. I'm glad at least someone recognizes that. On Jul 29, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Fred Cooke wrote: > <3 isn't sufficient, but this is: > http://stuff.fredcooke.com/throbbing.heart.gif > > Quality from the top, I like it. > > Fred/vroo. > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 6:

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

<3 isn't sufficient, but this is: http://stuff.fredcooke.com/throbbing.heart.gif Quality from the top, I like it. Fred/vroo. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > I was referring to the remote resources plugin which is associated with > the 3.1.1 release. > > I have not attem

Maven 3.1.1 and MSITE-695

Hi All: Does anyone here have the influence to get fixed or time to fix https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-695 ? This is blocking adoption of Maven 3.1 for Log4j 2. Thank you, Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

I was referring to the remote resources plugin which is associated with the 3.1.1 release. I have not attempted to release 3.1.1 and I have not sent out any release vote. I do intend to add what Sebb suggested by adding the revision. On Jul 29, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Fred Cooke wrote: > Jason, th

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

Jason, there seems to be no trace of either the new or old tag for 3.1.1 on either ASF server or github. Did you push it? Did you not push it on purpose? What are your plans for tags until the release plugin is updated to allow creation of suffixed tags during the release to be supplemented by a f

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

Nope, I sent it directly to you to avoid noise on the list, but if you insist on being a and spamming everyone, so be it. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > 2013/7/29 Fred Cooke > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > > > >> 2013/7/29 Fred Co

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

And we haven't had the vote thread yet... so still time for rot13:froo to chime in again! On 29 July 2013 15:06, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > 2013/7/29 Fred Cooke > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > > > >> 2013/7/29 Fred Cooke > >> > >> > Tag deleted? :-/ > >> > > >>

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

2013/7/29 Fred Cooke > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > >> 2013/7/29 Fred Cooke >> >> > Tag deleted? :-/ >> > >> >> Wasn't it already discussed? Are you going to endlessly send that same >> email here? >> > > No, I'm going to spice it up a little each time, just for you

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

2013/7/29 Fred Cooke > Tag deleted? :-/ > Wasn't it already discussed? Are you going to endlessly send that same email here?

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

Tag deleted? :-/ On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Tag deleted, repository dropped, and now re-released and restaged. > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-034/ > > On Jul 29, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > > Yes, the loss of Maven 2.2.

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

Tag deleted, repository dropped, and now re-released and restaged. https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-034/ On Jul 29, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Yes, the loss of Maven 2.2.1 compatibility is critical IMO. > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Jason van Zyl

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > Personally I'm not a huge fan of the release-model as done by Jenkins, > meaning releasing once or twice a week with only a few fixes. > As a user I'm not going to update for every new release, it most have real > value before I upgr

Re: [aether-dev] Release of 0.9.0.M3

On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:46 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > Is there a release note somewhere ? > As aether is an important part of Maven I think it is important to add a > link (or even more to include) the release note(s) related to such upgrade > We already had the issue in the past with external c

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

Yes, the loss of Maven 2.2.1 compatibility is critical IMO. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Is this critical for this release? I staged the release already? > > On Jul 29, 2013, at 5:39 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > >> Hi Jason >> >> I had a fix for MRRESOURCES-61 that I h

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

Is this critical for this release? I staged the release already? On Jul 29, 2013, at 5:39 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi Jason > > I had a fix for MRRESOURCES-61 that I have committed to trunk now. > > When testing out the sample project that is in that issue I first had > problems running it

Re: git commit: o testing eclipse aether 0.9.0.M3. looks good with the ITs

That's why I just put it on a branch just to give it a smoke test for Benjamin. I don't plan on integrating it until after 3.1.1. On Jul 29, 2013, at 2:13 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > a lot of things were done in 0.9.0.M3: will need to review > > notice the apidocs is not published yet > http://

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

Hi Jason I had a fix for MRRESOURCES-61 that I have committed to trunk now. When testing out the sample project that is in that issue I first had problems running it with maven-remote-resources-plugin 1.5-SNAPSHOT on Maven 2.2.1. After adding a missing dependency I got it working again. It works

Re: [aether-dev] Release of 0.9.0.M3

Is there a release note somewhere ? As aether is an important part of Maven I think it is important to add a link (or even more to include) the release note(s) related to such upgrade We already had the issue in the past with external components (plexus ...) but it is more important for aether I th

Strange handling of + in version portion of GAV

http://repo.jenkins-ci.org/releases/org/jenkins-ci/plugins/build-monitor-plugin/1.0+build.14/ Has anyone noticed that we don't seem to be encoding the + character when mapping GAV to URL?

Re: [aether-dev] Release of 0.9.0.M3

Hi Jason, that sounds great. Do you have information on http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2802 Recently this turned out to produce quite some build errors on our Jenkins. In the above mentioned Issue you noted, that you wanted to integrate that once Maven is upgraded to 0.9.0.M1 - which now is