Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Olivier Lamy, Dennis Lundberg, Stephen Connolly, Hervé Boutemy
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This will be the final release of this shared comp
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Dennis Lundberg, Stephen Connolly, Olivier Lamy,
Stephane Nicoll, Hervé Boutemy
+1 (non binding): Lennart Jörelid
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Dennis Lundberg
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Le 25 juil. 2013 23:05, "Stephen Connolly"
a écrit :
>
> Perhaps we could reframe the question a little then (as people seem to be
> testing hung up on the committed wording)...
>
> Should the PMC encourage people experimenting on new improvements to Maven
> to do that work at the ASF?
Sure. I do
As we launched the other thread about removing the Java 6 support after
september I never communicated about this survey but it seems that we have
some readers here as we had 180 replies without doing anything :
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Jqxq2KgSricwS7YV7pmWvHA8m7_TE7c8JhusugPmGW4/viewanalyt
On 23 July 2013 14:59, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core.
>
> Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as
> compatible with older versions of Maven Core as their baseline will still
> require to stick to t
On Jul 25, 2013, at 5:05 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Perhaps we could reframe the question a little then (as people seem to be
> testing hung up on the committed wording)...
>
> Should the PMC encourage people experimenting on new improvements to Maven
> to do that work at the ASF? And if so
