Hi, I am a newer apache maven developer,
I am reading the maven classes to understand your work... and I really like
the code that I have saw.
My goal is get a DependencyTree object. I am creating an aplication to
migrate Apache Maven 1 to Apache Maven 2. I know the goal one:convert, but I
need
On 4 July 2013 23:47, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2013, at 6:06 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 4 July 2013 20:35, Stephen Connolly
>> wrote:
>>> I am withdrawing my -1 on the basis of the feedback I have received from
>>> legal-discuss.
>>
>> The question to legal-discuss was specifically about
On Thursday, 4 July 2013, sebb wrote:
> On 4 July 2013 20:35, Stephen Connolly
> >
> wrote:
> > I am withdrawing my -1 on the basis of the feedback I have received from
> > legal-discuss.
>
> The question to legal-discuss was specifically about test data, not test
> code.
That "code" is actuall
On Jul 4, 2013, at 6:06 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 4 July 2013 20:35, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>> I am withdrawing my -1 on the basis of the feedback I have received from
>> legal-discuss.
>
> The question to legal-discuss was specifically about test data, not test code.
>
> Does the reply to you
On 4 July 2013 20:35, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> I am withdrawing my -1 on the basis of the feedback I have received from
> legal-discuss.
The question to legal-discuss was specifically about test data, not test code.
Does the reply to your query about test data also apply to test code?
As I read
I am withdrawing my -1 on the basis of the feedback I have received from
legal-discuss.
My vote is now +0 as I have not tested the distribution and I am waiting
for somebody else on the PMC to do the running and make a call on whether
we need to fix the NOTICE file for this release.
I intend test
On 4 July 2013 14:18, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> On 4 July 2013 22:29, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>> I will let Barrie decide on whether we *have to* cancel this vote because
>> of the issues he identified in the NOTICE file.
>
> Sebb noticed it.
>
> I just dig the version control sleuthing that sho
On 4 July 2013 22:29, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> I will let Barrie decide on whether we *have to* cancel this vote because
> of the issues he identified in the NOTICE file.
Sebb noticed it.
I just dig the version control sleuthing that showed we have been
failing this for a long time.
I think ha
Fair enough.
On Jul 4, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> I will let Barrie decide on whether we *have to* cancel this vote because
> of the issues he identified in the NOTICE file.
>
> Until I hear back from legal-discuss, I do not know whether the test data
> issue has any changes r
I will let Barrie decide on whether we *have to* cancel this vote because
of the issues he identified in the NOTICE file.
Until I hear back from legal-discuss, I do not know whether the test data
issue has any changes required, so I do not know whether (on the bits I am
focusing) there is a requir
On 4 July 2013 13:14, sebb wrote:
> On 4 July 2013 12:52, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
> > On 4 July 2013 12:32, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 4 July 2013 11:05, Stephen Connolly >
> >> wrote:
> >> > I have asked the legal-discuss list for an opinion on test data sets
> and
> >> > license headers. From
Then just make the changes you see fit and I'll roll it again. It will only
take a few minutes. If we know what it should be like then we might as well
just do it, as it's likely to take less time than asking if an exception can be
made.
I can cancel the vote. Make the changes you think are req
On 4 July 2013 12:52, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> On 4 July 2013 12:32, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 4 July 2013 11:05, Stephen Connolly
>> wrote:
>> > I have asked the legal-discuss list for an opinion on test data sets and
>> > license headers. From my reading of the current ASF position:
>> > http://www
On 4 July 2013 12:32, sebb wrote:
> On 4 July 2013 11:05, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
> > I have asked the legal-discuss list for an opinion on test data sets and
> > license headers. From my reading of the current ASF position:
> > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions we do
On 4 July 2013 11:05, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> I have asked the legal-discuss list for an opinion on test data sets and
> license headers. From my reading of the current ASF position:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions we do not
> currently have an exception for test da
I have asked the legal-discuss list for an opinion on test data sets and
license headers. From my reading of the current ASF position:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions we do not
currently have an exception for test data sets.
Pending the outcome of that discussion I will
+1
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Baptiste MATHUS wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> 2013/7/1 sebb
>
> > On 1 July 2013 03:56, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> > > On 1 July 2013 06:52, sebb wrote:
> > >> Another problem: the NOTICE file contains the following spurious text:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> =
+1 (non-binding)
2013/7/1 sebb
> On 1 July 2013 03:56, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> > On 1 July 2013 06:52, sebb wrote:
> >> Another problem: the NOTICE file contains the following spurious text:
> >>
> >>
> =
> >>== NOT
Hi
You have to sign up at http://xircles.codehaus.org/ to be able to record
issue.
Regards
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Akanksha Dayal [mailto:dayal.ak...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 3 juillet 2013 17:51
À : Olivier Lamy
Cc : Maven Developers List
Objet : Re: Issue# svn scm maven plug
19 matches
Mail list logo
