maven-wagon pull request: Fix for SFTP on windows machine

2013-07-01 Thread nill14
Github user nill14 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-wagon/pull/2 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: git commit: Some updates to start working on a proper LICENCE/NOTICE

2013-07-01 Thread sebb
On 1 July 2013 21:29, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 1a6bc6276 -> b4dc8931f > > > Some updates to start working on a proper LICENCE/NOTICE > > > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/repo > Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/commit/b4dc8931 > Tr

maven-surefire pull request: Parallel Computer

2013-07-01 Thread Tibor17
GitHub user Tibor17 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/26 Parallel Computer This is an implementation of PC moved from my private repo to surefire project. It will fix and improve the PC. This impl can distinguish between JUnit classes (tests)

maven-surefire pull request: Parallel Computer

2013-07-01 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/25 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

maven-surefire pull request: Proposed use of New JUnit ParallelComputer in ...

2013-07-01 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/17 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

maven-plugins pull request: [MPMD-168] Add parameter to skip report generat...

2013-07-01 Thread adangel
Github user adangel closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/11 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Release process updates (try 2)

2013-07-01 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Monday, 1 July 2013, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > Guys, even if not convinced this is really useful, > I suppose voting template could just be adjusted so that the sha1 > or svn revision be added in the VOTE thread, and then get back to code as > usual? +1 > > As it is just a 5 seconds additional

Re: Release process updates (try 2)

2013-07-01 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
Guys, even if not convinced this is really useful, I suppose voting template could just be adjusted so that the sha1 or svn revision be added in the VOTE thread, and then get back to code as usual? As it is just a 5 seconds additional operation to be done by the RM, I think this is acceptable if t

Re: Release process updates (try 2)

2013-07-01 Thread Fred Cooke
Deleting and recreating a Git tag once published is an *extremely* stupid thing to do, at least an order of magnitude more so than the same action in SVN. I sincerely hope that developers in this community would not engage in such activities. Nevertheless, this thread isn't about that, it's about

Re: Release process updates (try 2)

2013-07-01 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 - I agree with Chris. Besides, if something DOES change in the svn/git tag, we get an email notification so we can immediately figure out what's going on. In addition, if you compare what you are voting on to whatever is the latest version of the the tag, if there is any difference

Re: Release process updates (try 2)

2013-07-01 Thread Benson Margulies
> > > > So, if everyone here likes this idea, by all means let's do that. On the > > other hand, if there is no consensus here, I wish that the Foundation > had a > > clearer venue for discussing global policies like this. > > I hope I don't have to argue that it is ASF policy to only release > sou

Re: Release process updates (try 2)

2013-07-01 Thread Chris Graham
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM, sebb wrote: > On 1 July 2013 07:18, Chris Graham wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:20 AM, sebb wrote: > > > >> Reminder: all this thread is just about is adding the following lines > >> to vote e-mails: > >> > >> SVN Tag: > >> > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repo

Re: Release process updates (try 2)

2013-07-01 Thread sebb
On 30 June 2013 23:33, sebb wrote: > On 30 June 2013 19:20, sebb wrote: >> Reminder: all this thread is just about is adding the following lines >> to vote e-mails: >> >> SVN Tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.9.1/ >> (r1496317) > > An alternativ

maven-scm pull request: SCM-681 : support whitespace for git operation

2013-07-01 Thread jmecosta
GitHub user jmecosta opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/4 SCM-681 : support whitespace for git operation Hi, Can you please consider this patch to support whitespace operation in git Thanks in advance Br, Jorge Costa You can mer

Re: Release process updates (try 2)

2013-07-01 Thread sebb
On 1 July 2013 07:18, Chris Graham wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:20 AM, sebb wrote: > >> Reminder: all this thread is just about is adding the following lines >> to vote e-mails: >> >> SVN Tag: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.9.1/ >> (r1496317<

Re: Release process updates (try 2)

2013-07-01 Thread sebb
On 1 July 2013 07:18, Chris Graham wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:20 AM, sebb wrote: > >> Reminder: all this thread is just about is adding the following lines >> to vote e-mails: >> >> SVN Tag: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.9.1/ >> (r1496317<

Re: Release process updates

2013-07-01 Thread sebb
On 1 July 2013 08:17, Andreas Gudian wrote: >> 2013/6/26 sebb >: >> > The mission of the ASF is to release software as source, and to ensure >> > that the released source is available under the Apache Licence. >> >> Excuse me but I have always understand the ASF mission as building >> communities

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0

2013-07-01 Thread sebb
On 1 July 2013 03:56, Barrie Treloar wrote: > On 1 July 2013 06:52, sebb wrote: >> Another problem: the NOTICE file contains the following spurious text: >> >>= >>== NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of

Re: Release process updates

2013-07-01 Thread Andreas Gudian
> 2013/6/26 sebb >: > > The mission of the ASF is to release software as source, and to ensure > > that the released source is available under the Apache Licence. > > Excuse me but I have always understand the ASF mission as building > communities around softwares. > Community over Code and not Pro