Re: Project.version too contextual

2013-05-23 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Yes, that's what i expected but ATM in TomEE we have hardcoded version and for half of the project it matches the project.version (but only half :(). That's not blocking at all but if maven could get this kind of feature (maybe #{project.version}) it would be really great *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Tw

Re: Project.version too contextual

2013-05-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
yes, it is the expected behaviour see [1] for complete documentation of the model building algorithm: project.version is evaluated during "model interpolation", which happens after inheritance AFAIK, there is no feature to evaluate before inheritance: this would require a new notation than ${xx

Project.version too contextual

2013-05-23 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi guys, Project.version seems evaluated by pom and not from the pom it is defined (at least in a multi modules project without a single version). So basically you can get a version very different from the expected one. If this is the expected behavior, could it be another variable to force the

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
Thanks. On May 23, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > site published (sync pending): > http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.1.0-alpha-1 > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 16:52:13 Jason van Zyl a écrit : >> If you are to test the source you're suppose to actually test the source

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
site published (sync pending): http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.1.0-alpha-1 Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 16:52:13 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > If you are to test the source you're suppose to actually test the source > distribution. > > If you want to test via the sha1 here you go: > 32d720ea0

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
If you are to test the source you're suppose to actually test the source distribution. If you want to test via the sha1 here you go: 32d720ea0c669d4f55c0f71e4f3e054695648732 If someone else can publish the site I'd appreciate it. On May 23, 2013, at 4:26 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > What i

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-23 Thread Stephen Connolly
What is the tag or git hash (as votes are on source not on binary builds) and is the site staged? On Thursday, 23 May 2013, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: > > Release notes: > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967 >

[VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
Here are the release bits for 3.1.0-alpha-1: Release notes: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-038/ Staged distribution: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ma