Re: Archetype registry file

2013-04-19 Thread Chris Graham
What I can add: is that when I was developing archetypes a few years back, the archetypes I developed did appear in that file. (my memory may be wrong), but I do not ever remember adding them manually to the file. Ate there hooks in install/deploy or the archetype plugin to do that? Just a stab

Re: maven 3.1.0-alpha-1 adoption feedback

2013-04-19 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le vendredi 19 avril 2013 15:17:44 Stuart McCulloch a écrit : > > The other change which breaks tycho is aether moved to the org.eclipse > > package namespace. Looks like for aether users it's a simple "organize > > imports"; no API changes other than package rename, right? As there seems > > to be

Re: maven 3.1.0-alpha-1 adoption feedback

2013-04-19 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 19 Apr 2013, at 14:49, Sievers, Jan wrote: > Hi, > > I tried adapting tycho to maven 3.1.0-alpha-1, see [1]. > > One thing I noticed is that maven now brings asm-3.3.1 as part of its core > classloader. > This breaks a build plugin in tycho (binary mismach errors at runtime) which > happens

maven 3.1.0-alpha-1 adoption feedback

2013-04-19 Thread Sievers, Jan
Hi, I tried adapting tycho to maven 3.1.0-alpha-1, see [1]. One thing I noticed is that maven now brings asm-3.3.1 as part of its core classloader. This breaks a build plugin in tycho (binary mismach errors at runtime) which happens to use asm-4.0. Am I right that shipping asm with maven core m

Re: Archetype registry file

2013-04-19 Thread Anders Hammar
ARCHETYPE-433 filed to track this. /Anders On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > I did some cleanup a few years ago when stabilizing the plugin, and > experience > showed that there is dead code that require investigation to really see if > it's dead or not. I missed this one

Re: Archetype registry file

2013-04-19 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I did some cleanup a few years ago when stabilizing the plugin, and experience showed that there is dead code that require investigation to really see if it's dead or not. I missed this one, but there are AFAIK sufficient unit and integration tests to remove and check if it breaks something (tha

Re: Archetype registry file

2013-04-19 Thread Stuart McCulloch
Ah, it was removed in favour of -Darchetype.properties= http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-112 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=635711 So it looks like the local archetype registry file is no longer relevant. On 19 Apr 2013, at 10:04, Anders Hammar wrote

Re: Archetype registry file

2013-04-19 Thread Anders Hammar
Right, and I've traced it to ArchetypeRegistryManager. The problem is that I can't see that it is ever used in the code, at least not for the registry stuff. /Anders On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > http://maven.apache.org/archetype/archetype-models/archetype-regist

Re: Archetype registry file

2013-04-19 Thread Stuart McCulloch
http://maven.apache.org/archetype/archetype-models/archetype-registry/archetype-registry.html AFAICT it's related to which files get filtered when creating a project from the archetype On 19 Apr 2013, at 08:24, Anders Hammar wrote: > Does anyone know what a archetype registry file is? It's poss

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-19 Thread Stuart McCulloch
Not sure, but I've just logged https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=406056 in the Tycho project so it's at least tracked. On 19 Apr 2013, at 07:53, Anders Hammar wrote: > Does anyone (Igor?) know if there is work going on to make Tycho work with > this? > > /Anders > > > On Fri, Apr

Archetype registry file

2013-04-19 Thread Anders Hammar
Does anyone know what a archetype registry file is? It's possible to specify this for the create-from-project goal of the archetype plugin and the default location is "${user.home}/.m2/archetype.xml". Can't see it's being used anywhere though... /Anders

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-19 Thread Anders Hammar
Does anyone (Igor?) know if there is work going on to make Tycho work with this? /Anders On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > back to the vote > +1 > > - maven-report-exec 1.1 makes m-site-p work with this release: no need to > wait > for m-site-p 3.3, we can add instructions