Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-09 Thread Andrei Pozolotin
this will work as well, thank you for the idea. Original Message Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 From: Nigel Magnay To: Maven Developers List Date: Tue 09 Apr 2013 03:47:21 AM CDT > This keeps coming up, over and over and over. > > e.g: > http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.c

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.4 and Maven Surefire 2.14.1

2013-04-09 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Regards, Hervé Le lundi 8 avril 2013 18:42:08 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit : > And, to increase my winning chance in "messiest vote thread of the > year", here's the correct link > for surefire 2.14.1 solved issues ;) > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&versio

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-09 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
that's it, it works thank you Stuart: I knew I was missing something like this = few code but major structure :) Regards, Hervé Le mardi 9 avril 2013 12:30:31 Stuart McCulloch a écrit : > On 9 Apr 2013, at 03:33, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > I just did the reimport and changed API to let the code

Re: User defined plugin extension points ?

2013-04-09 Thread Robert Scholte
If this would help with MRELEASE-564 and other equivalent issues I'm all ears. The issue I'm facing is that the maven-release-plugin can't detect dependencies/artifacts specified within the configuration. These are files you can't just add to the dependencies of the plugin, because they have

Re: User defined plugin extension points ?

2013-04-09 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Doesnt each plugin needs its own handling? Maybe some event base siluyion with just a spi yo register listeners is better (like in arquillian) Le 9 avr. 2013 21:49, "Baptiste MATHUS" a écrit : > +1. Would be great. > I was recently thinking about this when designing an enforcer rule about > nam

Re: User defined plugin extension points ?

2013-04-09 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
+1. Would be great. I was recently thinking about this when designing an enforcer rule about naming & dependency rule. I want to define some simple config through XML, but also considered being able to inject some kind of DependencyNamingRulesStrategy by anyone who would not have enough with the st

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.4 and Maven Surefire 2.14.1

2013-04-09 Thread Andreas Gudian
+1 :) 2013/4/9 Olivier Lamy > +1 > > > 2013/4/9 Kristian Rosenvold : > > And, to increase my winning chance in "messiest vote thread of the > > year", here's the correct link > > for surefire 2.14.1 solved issues ;) > > > > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&ver

Re: User defined plugin extension points ?

2013-04-09 Thread Andreas Gudian
How does the wicket-style approach look like? I think we should end up with something that allows to have: * multiple implementations of the same interface, e.g. different test filters, different test run listeners * configurable extensions, e.g. configure details for the filters or run listener

Re: DepMgt is useless because not transitive

2013-04-09 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Yes when I analyzed the behavior, seeing it was here for long long time I understood that it was probably done by design. I had a look at our doc ( http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#Dependency_Management) and we should probably detail more this be

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-09 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 9 Apr 2013, at 03:33, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > I just did the reimport and changed API to let the code compile [1] > > but I get Guice provisioning exceptions during tests: probably something > stupid in initialization, but I don't know what to do > Can you help me at this step, please? You ne

User defined plugin extension points ?

2013-04-09 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
surefire (and quite a few other plugins) seem to be screaming for a simple way to add user-defined extension points for easy ability to modify/extend capabilities without forking the plugin or further bloating it for yet more marginal use cases. Conceptually I'm thinking somewhere along these line

Re: DepMgt is useless because not transitive

2013-04-09 Thread Jason van Zyl
This is how is was designed to work. Aether can do anything but the original implementation is simply a map of GAs with a version preference. If the GA is encountered then its version is overridden. This effectively gives you a target platform like mechanism but is intended to be controlled from

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.4 and Maven Surefire 2.14.1

2013-04-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2013/4/9 Kristian Rosenvold : > And, to increase my winning chance in "messiest vote thread of the > year", here's the correct link > for surefire 2.14.1 solved issues ;) > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=19135 > > > > 2013/4/7 Kristian Rosenvold : >

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-09 Thread Nigel Magnay
This keeps coming up, over and over and over. e.g: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Meta-information-about-dependencies-in-a-pom-td4971927.html The maven 'answer' seems to amount to 'hard cheese, you must re-specify each and every one of your dependencies again in your plugin config'. And then po

Re: DepMgt is useless because not transitive

2013-04-09 Thread Arnaud Héritier
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > uh, really interesting case > I was sure you'll like it ;-) > > this gives me more interest in reimporting maven-aether-provider unit > tests to > reproduce and track the issue :) > > +1 > I just tried the example, but the beta spring ar