Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-03 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
> And lastly.. about the site.. I am not sure where this will go in the form > it is on the staging site .. what content on the current site would it > replace? I don't understand, please explain Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 3 avril 2013 11:58:36 Manfred Moser a écrit : > +1 from me (non binding w

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-03 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
AFAIK, there is nothing "relaxed" from Mven 3.0.x planned But I don't really understand your case (and miss time to investigate in Karaf). Can you give us a pointer to SCM, or paste such a dependency "with custom tags"? Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 3 avril 2013 08:51:01 Andrei Pozolotin a écrit

Re: releasing Maven Site Plugin 3.3

2013-04-03 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Hi Robert, Thank you for the nice work: it's great. I'll work on it this WE, while doing m-report-exec and Doxia release. Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 3 avril 2013 21:57:53 Robert Scholte a écrit : > Hi Hervé, > > the issues you've mentioned aren't solved yet. > Are you going to solve these you

Re: releasing Maven Site Plugin 3.3

2013-04-03 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Hervé, the issues you've mentioned aren't solved yet. Are you going to solve these yourself? There are no blocking issues for me so release whenever you want. Those which I can fix before the release are just lucky :) Robert Op Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:18:25 +0100 schreef Hervé BOUTEMY : Futu

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-03 Thread Manfred Moser
Thats fine.. it was just very quiet. Thanks Stephen. manfred > I am still poking around with it... when I am happy that I trust it I will > vote... AFAIR we are not running with the strict 72h anyways given the > scope of this change in terms of moving APIs > > > On 3 April 2013 16:58, Manfred M

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-03 Thread Stephen Connolly
I am still poking around with it... when I am happy that I trust it I will vote... AFAIR we are not running with the strict 72h anyways given the scope of this change in terms of moving APIs On 3 April 2013 16:58, Manfred Moser wrote: > +1 from me (non binding whatsoever but anyway) > > I teste

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-03 Thread Manfred Moser
+1 from me (non binding whatsoever but anyway) I tested it with the build for the android maven plugin and ksoap2-android and a few other projects. Apart from the expected problems with shade, site and dependency plugin the android maven plugin also fails with this due to accessing Aether directl

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-04-03 Thread Andrei Pozolotin
I am curious if 3.1.0 will be more relaxed with custom tags inside ? Use case: karaf-maven-plugin uses bizarre conventions on how to map from into osgi bundle properties (like start level) because there is no way to have a custom tag in and express this requirement. Original Message --

[VOTE] Apache Maven Shared Incremental 1.1 and Apache Maven Compiler Plugin 3.1 (take 3)

2013-04-03 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, Apache Maven Shared Incremental 1.1 We fixed 1 issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=19002&styleName=Text&projectId=11761&Create=Create Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-057/ Staging site: http://maven.apache.org/shared-a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Shared Incremental 1.1 and Apache Maven Compiler Plugin 3.1 (take 2)

2013-04-03 Thread Olivier Lamy
I add some network issues while releasing so that explain some wired results. So I cancel the vote and will retry an other one. 2013/4/3 Grzegorz Słowikowski : > Hi > > So, why the plugin version is 3.2 instead of 3.1? > I see two release (3.1 and 3.2) in repository generated recently. > Are th