good idea
any objection?
Regards,
Hervé
Le lundi 4 février 2013 11:11:32 Brian Fox a écrit :
> i'm on the fence about if this is good or not, but I think the option if
> provided should be simple-local-repository without the manager part. People
> already get confused about what's a local repo
Hi,
I'd like to release Maven Pmd Plugin 3.0.
Note this version is based on PMD 5.0.1 (reason for the version bump).
We fixed 18 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MPMD+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%223.0%22+AND+status+%3D+Closed+ORDER+BY+priority+DES
I think my case was network issues due to an unstable (enterprise) proxy
too.
Le 4 févr. 2013 21:22, "Robert Scholte" a écrit :
> I haven't faced these issues myself, but some colleagues contacted me
> about it.
> It occurred due to an unstable proxy/network and they knew enough to know
> how to
I haven't faced these issues myself, but some colleagues contacted me
about it.
It occurred due to an unstable proxy/network and they knew enough to know
how to switch between the Artifact Repository and connecting to Maven
Central directly. From that moment on they were doomed.
So a good me
On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Nicolas Delsaux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>>
>> If you have no proxy and you are all just pointing at Maven Central then
>> this particular feature will not affect you. Maven, with no mirrorOf
>> configuration in a settings
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>
> If you have no proxy and you are all just pointing at Maven Central then this
> particular feature will not affect you. Maven, with no mirrorOf configuration
> in a settings.xml, will follow the repositories listed in the POMs. If you
>
Anyone who's interested in MNG-5181, pop into #maven-dev on irc.codehaus.org as
I want to clarify what the behavior actually is and answer any questions. It's
obvious the motive for the feature isn't understood very clearly which is a
documentation/communication problem on the Maven developer's
On Feb 4, 2013, at 5:55 AM, Nicolas Delsaux wrote:
> Sorry to jump in that conversation like the user I'm, but having seen
> some messages of both Arnaud and Olivier, I feel I should add my own
> noise to that discussion.
>
> First, a little context info.
> My company build a complex system, in
i'm on the fence about if this is good or not, but I think the option if
provided should be simple-local-repository without the manager part. People
already get confused about what's a local repo vs what's a repository
manager and the mixing of these concepts here will make that worse.
On Sat, Fe
Sorry to jump in that conversation like the user I'm, but having seen
some messages of both Arnaud and Olivier, I feel I should add my own
noise to that discussion.
First, a little context info.
My company build a complex system, involving flexmojos artifacts and
other ones coming from various rep
10 matches
Mail list logo