Re: Request User Guide for Project Migration from Maven 2.0 to 3.0

2013-01-23 Thread Brett Porter
Maven 3 is largely compatible with Maven 2. See: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+Notes - Brett On 22/01/2013, at 4:03 AM, haritha challa wrote: > Hello Team, > > Greetings. > > Request you to share the complete *User Guide for Project Migration from >

Re: Modello 1, benson 0

2013-01-23 Thread Benson Margulies
Thanks. On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > so first diff. > > > 2013/1/23 Benson Margulies : >> 1 >> >> On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:26 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> >>> Index: src/main/mdo/AttachArtifact.mdo >>> === >>> -

Re: Modello 1, benson 0

2013-01-23 Thread Olivier Lamy
so first diff. 2013/1/23 Benson Margulies : > 1 > > On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:26 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> Index: src/main/mdo/AttachArtifact.mdo >> === >> --- src/main/mdo/AttachArtifact.mdo (revision 1437390) >> +++ src/main/mdo/At

Re: Modello 1, benson 0

2013-01-23 Thread Benson Margulies
1 On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:26 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Index: src/main/mdo/AttachArtifact.mdo > === > --- src/main/mdo/AttachArtifact.mdo (revision 1437390) > +++ src/main/mdo/AttachArtifact.mdo (working copy) > @@ -44,9 +44,7 @@ >

Re: Modello 1, benson 0

2013-01-23 Thread Olivier Lamy
Index: src/main/mdo/AttachArtifact.mdo === --- src/main/mdo/AttachArtifact.mdo (revision 1437390) +++ src/main/mdo/AttachArtifact.mdo (working copy) @@ -44,9 +44,7 @@ artifactId 1.0.0+ - -

Modello 1, benson 0

2013-01-23 Thread Benson Margulies
I have returned to the idea I floated some time ago for making shade get along better with the incremental build ideas. I've got this as MSHADE-139, and I've branched. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/branches/maven-shade-plugin-3 However, my simple attempt to add a modello file to

Re: settings or pom - where should repositories be defined?

2013-01-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
Brian has a good blog entry on this: http://www.sonatype.com/people/2009/02/why-putting-repositories-in-your-poms-is-a-bad-idea/ On Jan 23, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: > Hello, > > in a lot of threads on the dev and user list, I have read that "thou > shalt not define repositor

Re: settings or pom - where should repositories be defined?

2013-01-23 Thread Stephen Connolly
Well, for one thing, not all in the pom.xml are evil... Repositories which *only resolve -SNAPSHOT* artifacts are fine... better if you don't need them, but they are fine. I wrote a blog post about whether one should deploy -SNAPSHOTs in the first place: http://developer-blog.cloudbees.com/2012/