Re: lotsa files and svnpubsub was: svn commit: r843406

2013-01-03 Thread Brett Porter
On 02/01/2013, at 11:43 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 02/01/2013, at 10:45 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > >> Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 14:17:02 Brett Porter a écrit : >>> I had the same feeling pushing up Continuum's Maven site recently... >>> >>> On 23/12/2012, at 9:36 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:

maven-surefire pull request: Initial draft of a new "examples" page explain...

2013-01-03 Thread agudian
GitHub user agudian opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/19 Initial draft of a new "examples" page explaining the fork and parallel options Needs some proof-reading... :) Did I miss something? Do you have suggestions for a better structure?

Re: core-integration-testing-maven-3 jobs hangs

2013-01-03 Thread Anders Hammar
An extremely simple solution would be to require JDK 1.6 to build Maven (but keep Java 5 runtime requirement)... /Anders On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Here's another attempt. It would seem that someone somewhere simply does > not want people to do this! Here's a rund

Re: core-integration-testing-maven-3 jobs hangs

2013-01-03 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Here's another attempt. It would seem that someone somewhere simply does not want people to do this! Here's a rundown on the hoops I've had to jump through so far... * jstack.exe is not available in Sun's Windows 1.5 JDK * jstack.exe from JDK 1.6 is not allowed to hook into a 1.5 JVM * SendSigna

Re: maventest.apache.org

2013-01-03 Thread Benson Margulies
Hmm, it got better. On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > No problem here. You're going to have to be more specific... > > On 04/01/2013, at 12:35 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> Google is preferring maventest.apache.org to maven.apache.org. This >> can't be what we want. >> >>

Re: maventest.apache.org

2013-01-03 Thread Brett Porter
No problem here. You're going to have to be more specific... On 04/01/2013, at 12:35 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Google is preferring maventest.apache.org to maven.apache.org. This > can't be what we want. > > - > To unsubscr

Re: basedir vs project.basedir

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen Connolly
${basedir} and ${pom.basedir} are deprecated in favour of ${project.basedir} afaik On 3 January 2013 11:24, Anders Hammar wrote: > I've always been under the impression that one should use the property > "project.basedir" instead of just "basedir". Is that true or just my own > interpretation?

basedir vs project.basedir

2013-01-03 Thread Anders Hammar
I've always been under the impression that one should use the property "project.basedir" instead of just "basedir". Is that true or just my own interpretation? /Anders