Re: Logging

2013-01-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
yes, Maven isn't an app server, strict security manager shouldn't be an issue: if someone knows of a situation where it would be, please tell it :) the very good news with this solution is that it is at slf4j-api level, not dependent on logging implementation! I'll look at it in the WE, if nobo

Re: Top navbar on the site with fluido

2013-01-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
yes, we must avoid the "it was better before" effect then do nothing but tell the problems to find a solution to me, left-side menu is good for most used links, ie "Overview", "Examples" and "Modules" top bar is good for less used links: "Poject Documentation", "Maven Projects", "ASF" I don't

Re: core-integration-testing-maven-3 jobs hangs

2013-01-01 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
A thread dump is worth a thousand words ;) K Den 2. jan. 2013 kl. 04:28 skrev Dennis Lundberg : > Hi > > I've done some more digging into this and have come to the following > conclusions: > > 1. It is not the ITs that are the problem - it's the building of core > itself. > > 2. The build hangs

RE: A subtlety with forked executions, looking for advice

2013-01-01 Thread Martin Gainty
> Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:04:22 -0500 > Subject: Re: A subtlety with forked executions, looking for advice > From: bimargul...@gmail.com > To: dev@maven.apache.org > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > > > > definition of fork must've been lost in translation or maybe a

Re: Logging

2013-01-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
It is. You create that package structure in your app to access it. jvz On 2013-01-01, at 8:48 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > If I read that right it is accessing a package local method... > > That won't work with a security manager in play (not that we have one) > [unless we repackage the api

Re: Logging

2013-01-01 Thread Stephen Connolly
If I read that right it is accessing a package local method... That won't work with a security manager in play (not that we have one) [unless we repackage the api jar] but just wondering if that may affect embedded use? On Tuesday, 1 January 2013, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Jan 1, 2013, at 6:15

Re: A subtlety with forked executions, looking for advice

2013-01-01 Thread Benson Margulies
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > > definition of fork must've been lost in translation or maybe a context switch > somewhere ... to avoid any confusion fork in plugin-metadata means > __fork in maven-surefire-plugin > means___

RE: A subtlety with forked executions, looking for advice

2013-01-01 Thread Martin Gainty
definition of fork must've been lost in translation or maybe a context switch somewhere ... to avoid any confusion fork in plugin-metadata means __fork in maven-surefire-plugin means__ Martin __

Re: Top navbar on the site with fluido

2013-01-01 Thread Jesse Farinacci
Greetings, On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > IMHO, top bar menu isn't ready for the moment: still need to find an idea to > make it efficient Perhaps, but I think it would be a mistake to abandon the top navigation menu. > for the moment, I stringly prefer to stay with the

Dev doc

2013-01-01 Thread Benson Margulies
I made some effort to reduce redundancy and improve accuracy on the top-level source-repository page versus the dev guide page. I'd like to do better. I think that the source repo page should contain a fairly comprehensive list of of all the bits and pieces -- particularly the maven repos, which c

Re: Logging

2013-01-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Jan 1, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 09:12:07 Jason van Zyl a écrit : >> If we want to put aside the debate, Ceki has figured out a way for use SLF4J >> Simple by resetting the streams and logging level. Which I can try if we >> want to go down that path.

Re: Top navbar on the site with fluido

2013-01-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
yes, an next times, it's just inefficient to navigate: we need some menus opened by default IMHO, top bar menu isn't ready for the moment: still need to find an idea to make it efficient for the moment, I stringly prefer to stay with the classic left column placement Regards, Hervé Le merc

Re: svn commit: r843406 - in /websites/production/maven/content/surefire-archives/surefire-2.13: ./ maven-failsafe-plugin/ maven-failsafe-plugin/css/ maven-failsafe-plugin/images/ maven-failsafe-plugi

2013-01-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 14:17:02 Brett Porter a écrit : > I had the same feeling pushing up Continuum's Maven site recently... > > On 23/12/2012, at 9:36 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > 2012/12/22 Kristian Rosenvold : > >> Svnsubpub is just ridiculously inefficient and we need to do something > >>

Re: git commit: fix site deploy for svnpubsub using site:stage with ${project.artifactId}-archives/${project.artifactId}-${project.version} will expand values in addition of parent so sucks for multi

2013-01-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le samedi 22 décembre 2012 23:37:05 Olivier Lamy a écrit : > 2012/12/22 Robert Scholte : > > Hi, > > > > I'm not really pleased with these scripts. The maven-release had cloned > > these files, and now they're out of sync. We must think of a better way to > > solve this. > > I have just synced. >

Re: Top navbar on the site with fluido

2013-01-01 Thread Chris Graham
+1 for the old placement. The first time I saw it, it threw me as I though that all of the content had been lost. -Chris Sent from my iPhone On 01/01/2013, at 10:42 PM, Anders Hammar wrote: > +1 > I think we should keep the old left-hand menu, like what we've done over at > Mojo. > > /Anders

Re: Logging

2013-01-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le lundi 24 décembre 2012 09:12:07 Jason van Zyl a écrit : > If we want to put aside the debate, Ceki has figured out a way for use SLF4J > Simple by resetting the streams and logging level. Which I can try if we > want to go down that path. I didn't have to do any work in SLF4J myself so > I'm fin

Re: core-integration-testing-maven-3 jobs hangs

2013-01-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi I've done some more digging into this and have come to the following conclusions: 1. It is not the ITs that are the problem - it's the building of core itself. 2. The build hangs when using Java 1.5, but succeeds using Java 1.6. 3. I have only verified this on Windows yet. Forensic report

Re: telling people where the core is

2013-01-01 Thread Benson Margulies
When I'm ten alligators deep sometimes I send off an email for something that i could fix myself. On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > http://maven.apache.org/developers/website/deploy-maven-website.html#Modify_Maven_Website_with_CMS_UI > > tells you how you should adjust this

Re: telling people where the core is

2013-01-01 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
done Le mardi 1 janvier 2013 20:25:40 Robert Scholte a écrit : > http://maven.apache.org/developers/website/deploy-maven-website.html#Modify_ > Maven_Website_with_CMS_UI > > tells you how you should adjust this. > > Op Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:47:13 +0100 schreef Benson Margulies > > : > > http://ma

Re: telling people where the core is

2013-01-01 Thread Robert Scholte
http://maven.apache.org/developers/website/deploy-maven-website.html#Modify_Maven_Website_with_CMS_UI tells you how you should adjust this. Op Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:47:13 +0100 schreef Benson Margulies : http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-m2-development.html still points only a

Re: Top navbar on the site with fluido

2013-01-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
I agree. On 2013-01-01 12:42, Anders Hammar wrote: > +1 > I think we should keep the old left-hand menu, like what we've done over at > Mojo. > > /Anders > > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Jesse Farinacci wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Kristian Rosenvold >>

Re: A subtlety with forked executions, looking for advice

2013-01-01 Thread Benson Margulies
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > > so in other words execution with no goal bound.. will rollback to the > declared defaultGoal?http://maven.apache.org/pom.html > (i wonder if perhaps the defaultGoal is incorrect for what i'm seeing in > surefire) > thanks Steve ..and Happ

RE: A subtlety with forked executions, looking for advice

2013-01-01 Thread Martin Gainty
so in other words execution with no goal bound.. will rollback to the declared defaultGoal?http://maven.apache.org/pom.html (i wonder if perhaps the defaultGoal is incorrect for what i'm seeing in surefire) thanks Steve ..and Happy New Year, Martin __

Re: A subtlety with forked executions, looking for advice

2013-01-01 Thread Benson Margulies
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > if phase is specified then goal is unused was my reading of the docs when I > read them (a while back and I am lazy and have not gone looking at/for the > docs since then) thanks. This implies that a forked execution of a mojo had better

RE: A subtlety with forked executions, looking for advice

2013-01-01 Thread Martin Gainty
ive had nothing but headaches with forked executions..specifically maven-surefire-plugin If I shut off fork in the falseeverything works i'm not sure if this aberrant behaviour can be reproduced with other goal bindings in other plugins but reading past blog entries from Tran ..forked executio

Re: A subtlety with forked executions, looking for advice

2013-01-01 Thread Stephen Connolly
if phase is specified then goal is unused was my reading of the docs when I read them (a while back and I am lazy and have not gone looking at/for the docs since then) On 1 January 2013 15:01, Benson Margulies wrote: > My mystification just deepened. > > If @Execute only contains 'goal', and th

Re: A subtlety with forked executions, looking for advice

2013-01-01 Thread Benson Margulies
My mystification just deepened. If @Execute only contains 'goal', and then the mojo is executed from command line, all is well. If I add a 'phase=', then the command-line execution stops working. That is, if I have both goal= and phase=, the goal seems to be ignored. And since nothing in the pom

Re: Top navbar on the site with fluido

2013-01-01 Thread Anders Hammar
+1 I think we should keep the old left-hand menu, like what we've done over at Mojo. /Anders On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Jesse Farinacci wrote: > Greetings, > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Kristian Rosenvold > wrote: > > There was a comment about this in the surefire release ( > >