( gmail send button)
2012/12/29 Kristian Rosenvold :
> work so well. But I think the dropdown menu
> simply works less well because it gives me much less of a "at a glance"
overview of what is present in the site.
I think my main gripe with the dropdown is that *some* parts of the
menu have
There was a comment about this in the surefire release (
(http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/),
so I figured we might as well get on with this discussion.
Being somewhat of a luddite with an appetite for all things new &
flashy, I happily accepted the site change
to the top men
yea, that is my idea
On Dec 28, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Nope
> Thanks to take care of that !!
> I just wonder if you will add stuff in various folders ? /plugins /shared
> etc...
>
> --
> Olivier
> Le 28 déc. 2012 19:09, "Benson Margulies" a écrit :
>
>> Anyone else have any inp
Nope
Thanks to take care of that !!
I just wonder if you will add stuff in various folders ? /plugins /shared
etc...
--
Olivier
Le 28 déc. 2012 19:09, "Benson Margulies" a écrit :
> Anyone else have any input to this? If not, I'll start copying things
> here and there soon.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2
Anyone else have any input to this? If not, I'll start copying things
here and there soon.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Absolutely, positively, only source-releases. Those are the only
> things that the Foundation sees as 'releases' and wants on /dist.
>
> I've sta
Much as I hate to distract people from the fun of arguing over logging
packages, I have another topic.
Say that you have an item that you want reactor support for -- that
is, you want to produce it over 'here', and consume it over 'there' in
the build.
For this to work, it has to be in the depend
Hi,
If SLF4J Simple is now a viable option again, i.e. the problems reported
with concurrency and embedding has been sorted out, then that is the
obvious choice to me.
On 2012-12-24 15:12, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> I'm going to push this along and I agree with Stephen insofar as if you
> prefer an
