Re: Site staging strategy

2012-12-06 Thread Anders Hammar
Lennart, Your attachments are missing. /Anders On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Lennart Jörelid wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a few reactors where two separate parent poms exist; one parent is > used exclusively for reactor projects [with pom] and > the other parent is exclusively used for al

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.1.0

2012-12-06 Thread Anders Hammar
> I'm interested to help working on adding a metadata to enable slf4j > visibility > from a plugin: by default, slf4j is not visible, plugins are expected to > use > plugin-api's Log. But if the plugin wants to use core's slf4j, he would be > able to add an annotation in the goal requiring shared c

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.1.0

2012-12-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Dec 6, 2012, at 4:34 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > I'm interested to help working on adding a metadata to enable slf4j > visibility > from a plugin: by default, slf4j is not visible, plugins are expected to use > plugin-api's Log. But if the plugin wants to use core's slf4j, he would be > ab

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.1.0

2012-12-06 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I'm interested to help working on adding a metadata to enable slf4j visibility from a plugin: by default, slf4j is not visible, plugins are expected to use plugin-api's Log. But if the plugin wants to use core's slf4j, he would be able to add an annotation in the goal requiring shared core slf4j

Site staging strategy

2012-12-06 Thread Lennart Jörelid
Hello all, I have a few reactors where two separate parent poms exist; one parent is used exclusively for reactor projects [with pom] and the other parent is exclusively used for all other projects [with ... something not pom ...]. The build itself works as expected - but the *mvn site:stage* bui