Minor problem, but I just noticed that wagon-http-2.3-shaded.jar and
wagon-provider-api-2.3.jar include what looks like test-related files
inside them.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 12-12-03 11:10 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Here is a link to Jira with 42 issues resolved:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secu
if the diff is included in the mail then that would be sufficient imo. But I'd
rather ping back to board if this is fine.
If the mail is created with git-format-patch and later applied via git-am then
this should be as fine as JIRA imo. Still a JIRA reference should be there for
referencing in
Github user krosenvold closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/11
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
2012/12/5 Mark Struberg :
> But to make this more clear, we will only accept pull changes if they come
> along with an identical JIRA with the diff. You also must make sure that you
> are the only one who has changed something in the contribution. It's way to
> easy to fake author Ids on github.
GitHub user krosenvold opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/11
A test pull request
o Changed runresult to be able to persist failsafe-summary.xml
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kros
But to make this more clear, we will only accept pull changes if they come
along with an identical JIRA with the diff. You also must make sure that you
are the only one who has changed something in the contribution. It's way to
easy to fake author Ids on github...
The committer which applies th
Mirroring to make it available in mainstream channels is a Good Thing
IMO. Pull requests are also nice.
Git goes a long way to eradicate the "committer bit" barrier to
contribution; anyone can fork and modify code
at next to zero cost. Some will also contribute back. Pushing to
github makes creati
What's Apache sources got to do at Github anywyays?
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> This git repo at Github mirrors the old Git repo. Is it possible to change
> that to the new git repo, or should it be removed all together?
>
> /Anders
>
--
The best argument for cel
