This seems to be a bug; would you mind filing an issue
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE ?
Kristian
2012/11/8 Larry Shatzer, Jr. :
> I'm using a fairly recent feature of Surefire where you can specify
> multiple providers (
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/
+1
tested on maven-clean-plugin
everything seems ok now in the site
thank you for finishing my initial updates on MPLUGIN-227: I knew it wasn't
perfect but didn't have sufficient time to do more and hoped this would at
least
help finding the right direction
Regards,
Hervé
Le mercredi 7 novem
I'm using a fairly recent feature of Surefire where you can specify
multiple providers (
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/providers.html
)
I'm using both TestNG and Junit. Here is the secion of the pom in question:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-surefire-p
2012/11/7 Kristian Rosenvold
> Having given this some more thought and corrolated with Dawid's mail,
> I think the main
> concern with free-running forks is in the logging/reporting bits. I'm
> still a firm beliver that *more* threads
> never make things simpler and I think you should clean up th
> I'll take a look at that. The only thing new to surefire in this patch
> is really dynamic allocation of tests to forked processes, since all
> the other stuff you mention is already supported.
Well, it's a lot more than just that ;) But I agree most of this stuff
(randomization, thread leak de
> If you have tests like that you end up having to use a new process for each
> test class. That's like having to decide between forkMode once and always
> in the single-threaded configuration. But yes, I've seen such tests as well
> :).
I agree that running a suite-per-jvm is the ultimate isolati
Goodness, I've just tried adding to settings.xml and so
far it seems to be happily scp'ing autonomously. I'm sure I tried
this the other night..
Thanks for listening,
Mark
On 7 November 2012 19:51, Mark Hobson wrote:
> I do mean passphrase. My public key is on people.apache.org.
>
> Adding
I do mean passphrase. My public key is on people.apache.org.
Adding to settings.xml results in:
[INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.1:deploy (default-deploy) @ maven-scm ---
[INFO] Parent project loaded from repository:
org.apache.maven:maven-parent:pom:22
[INFO] Parent project loaded from repositor
Do you really mean passphrase or password? Have you added your public key
to your authorized_keys on people?
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> I can ssh and scp to people.apache.org by entering my passphrase.
> I've even tried using ssh-add to remove the passph
2012/11/7 Andreas Gudian :
> Hey guys,
>
> thanks for your input. Kristian, I'd like to start with your concerns about
> the threading in the forked process. With the code as it is now, you are
> totally right, that threading in this LazyTestsToRun class is not really
> required. It's a left-over f
the ssh command. However, if the ssh command is succeeding, I'm puzzled.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> I can ssh and scp to people.apache.org by entering my passphrase.
> I've even tried using ssh-add to remove the passphrase prompt but it
> still resorts
2012/11/7 Dawid Weiss :
> http://labs.carrotsearch.com/randomizedtesting.html
> https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting
I'll take a look at that. The only thing new to surefire in this patch
is really dynamic allocation of tests to forked processes, since all
the other stuff you mention
Hi Benson,
I can ssh and scp to people.apache.org by entering my passphrase.
I've even tried using ssh-add to remove the passphrase prompt but it
still resorts to a password. What takes the -d switch you mention?
My settings.xml looks similar, but uncommenting still
doesn't stop the prompt.
Tha
Hey guys,
thanks for your input. Kristian, I'd like to start with your concerns about
the threading in the forked process. With the code as it is now, you are
totally right, that threading in this LazyTestsToRun class is not really
required. It's a left-over from a previous attempt where the forke
> some of the awesomest stuff I've seen in a long while, I simply have
I implemented such stuff for Apache Lucene/ Solr a while back, it's
been running for quite a while now. It's not technically Maven (it's
an Ant task) but a Maven plugin wrapper for it is also provided and
does an equivalent thi
Hi,
We solved 10 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11139&version=18639
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11139&status=1
** Note: When upgrading to this plugin it is important to run
2012/11/7 Kristian Rosenvold :
> The thing I wonder most about is that Andreas's code also maintains a
> queue of tests within each forked server (=test runner). When the
> queue runs empty, it requests more tests, which are provided from the
> ForkClient within the plugin. In my mind I had always
Andreas Gudian sent me a private email about this, but since this is
some of the awesomest stuff I've seen in a long while, I simply have
to share and invite the rest of you to participate in this discussion
;)
The patch provides reusable forks for surefire (we already support
parallel forks, now
Can you do a plain ssh to the target, and/or an SCP? If not, use -d and see
what the fuss is about. If so, then I suspect that you have the wrong
settings.xml.
Mine looks like:
apache.website
bimargulies
/users/benson/.ssh/id_rsa
On We
I'd be happy to temporarily not use keys and put my password in
settings.xml, although I still get prompted even then. What do others
do when deploying multi-module sites?
Thanks,
Mark
On 6 November 2012 23:00, Chris Graham wrote:
> Your key is being refused (for a variety of reasons). That's
20 matches
Mail list logo
