Re: GPG Keys

2012-10-30 Thread Mark Hobson
That worked, thanks Olivier. Mark On 30 October 2012 22:53, Olivier Lamy wrote: > I missed to update instructions here when we moved to svnpubsub for dist. > Now instrusctions up2date. > The file to update is located here > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/maven/ > > > 2012/10/30 Mark

Re: GPG Keys

2012-10-30 Thread Olivier Lamy
I missed to update instructions here when we moved to svnpubsub for dist. Now instrusctions up2date. The file to update is located here https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/maven/ 2012/10/30 Mark Hobson : > Hi, > > I'm trying to update the /dist/maven/KEYS file on people.apache.org as > des

Re: Releasing maven-scm and maven-scm-publish-plugin

2012-10-30 Thread Mark Hobson
Hi Robert, Is this in reference to SCM-698 which switched from plexus-maven-plugin to plexus-component-metadata? The latter plugin still correctly generates the plexus components.xml files for maven-scm. Perhaps the maven-invoker problem is specific to plexus annotations which I don't believe we

GPG Keys

2012-10-30 Thread Mark Hobson
Hi, I'm trying to update the /dist/maven/KEYS file on people.apache.org as described here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/project/KEYS It's owned by the svnwc user and I don't appear to have permissions to overwrite it. Am I missing something here? Thanks, Mark --

Re: Releasing maven-scm and maven-scm-publish-plugin

2012-10-30 Thread Robert Scholte
Mark, FYI, it seems like there's an issue with the plexus-component-metadata. My latest release is of the maven-invoker is missing the plexus/components.xml so I'll have to re-release a new one as soon as I know what the issue is. Running a package twice does generate the file. I assume it'

Re: Releasing maven-scm and maven-scm-publish-plugin

2012-10-30 Thread Mark Hobson
Sounds reasonable to me, I'll release it as 1.8.1. Mark On 27 October 2012 23:28, Chris Graham wrote: > 1.9 or 1.8.1? > > It doesn't appear to be a major change. > > -Chris > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 27/10/2012, at 11:31 PM, Mark Hobson wrote: > >> On 26 October 2012 21:14, Olivier Lamy wr

Re: [jira] (MACR-4) true includes timestamp instead of the string "-SNAPSHOT" for SNAPSHOT dependencies

2012-10-30 Thread John Casey
You would have more luck sending a message to: mailto:dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org On 10/30/12 4:21 PM, ws...@cox.net wrote: PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST!!! "Benjamin Cartereau (JIRA)" wrote: = [ https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MACR-4?page=com.atlas

Re: [jira] (MACR-4) true includes timestamp instead of the string "-SNAPSHOT" for SNAPSHOT dependencies

2012-10-30 Thread wseth
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST!!! "Benjamin Cartereau (JIRA)" wrote: = [ https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MACR-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=312634#comment-312634 ] Benjamin Cartereau commented on MAC

Re: svn commit: r1403795 - /maven/maven-3/trunk/maven-model-builder/src/site/apt/index.apt

2012-10-30 Thread wseth
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST!!! hbout...@apache.org wrote: = Author: hboutemy Date: Tue Oct 30 17:32:35 2012 New Revision: 1403795 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1403795&view=rev Log: added link to profile activators Modified: maven/maven-3/trunk/maven-m

Re: [jira] (MSITE-604) Properties from settings.xml are not recognized in site distribution management

2012-10-30 Thread wseth
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST!!! "Herve Boutemy (JIRA)" wrote: = [ https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=312635#comment-312635 ] Herve Boutemy commented on MSITE-604:

Re: svn commit: r1403830 - /maven/site/trunk/src/site/site.xml

2012-10-30 Thread wseth
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST rfscho...@apache.org wrote: = Author: rfscholte Date: Tue Oct 30 19:27:14 2012 New Revision: 1403830 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1403830&view=rev Log: Remove 'Powered by' menu-item. It's very outdated, doesn't reflect the cu

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-30 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2012/10/29 Kristian Rosenvold : > Hi, > > This is the first version of maven-shared-utils, a replacement for > plexus-utils. This version has been tested > extensively with the current maven code base, so as version numbers > come "0.1" is slightly arbitrary; we > expect to add a feature or tw

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
I think we should have both... but it may take me a while to actually get around to committing the change ;-) On 30 October 2012 10:45, Benson Margulies wrote: > Indeed, > http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html > does not mention the tag. If someone wants

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-30 Thread Benson Margulies
Indeed, http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html does not mention the tag. If someone wants both the source package *and* tag, someone should edit that. On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > The release guidelines say reference staged

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-30 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
The release guidelines say reference staged zip (http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html), so if we decide to switch we should update the guideline. I'd personally prefer the scm url, but I just followed the guide ;) Kristian 2012/10/30 Stephen Connolly :

Re: [VOTE] Maven Shared Utils 0.1, Take 2

2012-10-30 Thread Stephen Connolly
isn't the vote supposed to include the SCM tag details? On 29 October 2012 14:39, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > Hi, > > This is the first version of maven-shared-utils, a replacement for > plexus-utils. This version has been tested > extensively with the current maven code base, so as version numbe

Re: MSITE-604 - Properties from settings.xml are not recognized in site distribution management

2012-10-30 Thread Vincent Latombe
Hi, thank you for your feedback! 1) Several issues are actually interleaved, I believe the patch I propose also fix MSITE-632, and maybe other related issues, I haven't reviewed them all. Overall, the root cause seems to be that the parent is returned without being interpolated (see my comment [1

Re: MSITE-604 - Properties from settings.xml are not recognized in site distribution management

2012-10-30 Thread Lukas Theussl
Hi, First: thanks for working on this! I have had a brief look and have a few comments: 1) your patch of IT MSITE-604 seems to address a different issue than the one originally described in the JIRA. If this is the case you should open a separate ticket. 2) I am wondering about the validity of