[VOTE WITHDRAWN] maven parent 23

I'm withdrawing this vote so that Dennis can bump version(s). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Parent POM version 23

Dennis, I wish you had responded to my email inviting review of MPOM-38 that mentioned my intent to release. I'll tear it all down and leave it to you to release. On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > Would you mind waiting a bit with this release? I'm in the proces

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Parent POM version 23

Hi Would you mind waiting a bit with this release? I'm in the process of finishing the release of Maven Remote Resources Plugin 1.4. When done I plan to update the version of it in the ASF POM. After that I had planned to push for a release of ASF, Maven, Plugins and Shared POMs. Do we want to ke

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Parent POM version 23

+1 On Saturday, 27 October 2012, Benson Margulies wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 1 issues: > > > ** Bug > * [MPOM-38] - Enable RAT to help us get maven releases to be > license-header compliant > > > There are no issues for the top-level POM in JIRA. > > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apach

Re: Releasing maven-scm and maven-scm-publish-plugin

1.9 or 1.8.1? It doesn't appear to be a major change. -Chris Sent from my iPhone On 27/10/2012, at 11:31 PM, Mark Hobson wrote: > On 26 October 2012 21:14, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> 2012/10/26 Mark Hobson : >>> Any objections before I start a vote? >> Nope > > Great, I'll get the ball rolling

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Remote Resources Plugin version 1.4

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Olivier Lamy, Robert Scholte, Hervé Boutemy, Dennis Lundberg +1 (non binding): Tony Chemit I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. On 2012-10-24 23:22, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > http://jira

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Parent POM version 23

+1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Benson Margulies > To: Maven Developers List > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 11:30 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Parent POM version 23 > > My vote: +1 > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Parent POM version 23

My vote: +1 On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 1 issues: > > > ** Bug > * [MPOM-38] - Enable RAT to help us get maven releases to be > license-header compliant > > > There are no issues for the top-level POM in JIRA. > > > Staging repo: > https://repo

[VOTE] Release Maven Parent POM version 23

Hi, We solved 1 issues: ** Bug * [MPOM-38] - Enable RAT to help us get maven releases to be license-header compliant There are no issues for the top-level POM in JIRA. Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-170/ https://repository.apache.org/content/reposi

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Invoker version 2.1

+1 On Thursday, 25 October 2012, Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 8 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/**secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?** > projectId=11761&version=16460 > > There are still a couple of issues left

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Remote Resources Plugin version 1.4

+1 from me On 2012-10-24 23:22, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11391&styleName=Html&version=18793 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=tr

Re: [5/5] git commit: upgrade jackrabbit version

2012/10/27 Hervé BOUTEMY : > Warning: Jackrabbit 2.5 requires Java 6 (just discovered the problem looking > at Jenkins build failure) > > Can we really upgrade wagon? then Maven core? As long as we don't include dav wagon in core that's not an issue :-) > We at least need a strong warning to users

Re: [5/5] git commit: upgrade jackrabbit version

Warning: Jackrabbit 2.5 requires Java 6 (just discovered the problem looking at Jenkins build failure) Can we really upgrade wagon? then Maven core? We at least need a strong warning to users requiring webdav support Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 11 octobre 2012 21:03:03 ol...@apache.org a écrit : >

Re: Releasing maven-scm and maven-scm-publish-plugin

On 26 October 2012 21:14, Olivier Lamy wrote: > 2012/10/26 Mark Hobson : >> Any objections before I start a vote? > Nope Great, I'll get the ball rolling. >> Also, what is the convention for running maven-scm ITs? I'm guessing >> it's done manually prior to releasing. Does it require all the S

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Invoker version 2.1

+1 -- Olivier Le 25 oct. 2012 22:04, "Robert Scholte" a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 8 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/**secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?** > projectId=11761&version=16460 > > There are still a couple of is

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Invoker version 2.1

+1 Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 25 octobre 2012 22:04:06 Robert Scholte a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 8 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761&version=164 > 60 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Invoker version 2.1

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 11:57:29 +0200 "Robert Scholte" wrote: +1 thanks, tony. > +1 > > Op Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:04:06 +0200 schreef Robert Scholte > : > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 8 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761&version=16460 > > > > There are stil

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Invoker version 2.1

+1 Op Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:04:06 +0200 schreef Robert Scholte : Hi, We solved 8 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761&version=16460 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=pr