Re: Dropping the o

2012-09-23 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > 2012/9/24 Brett Porter : >> I also think 'o' should be avoided as a bullet - this subject line was >> confusing: >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-commits/201209.mbox/%3C20120922163532.5FF713906A%40tyr.zones.apache.org%3

Re: Building plugins with java 1.7 and the test-harness

2012-09-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I feel I'm not getting across entriely here; maven3 will be a requirement to build the plugins on /any/ jdk (not to use them) The only real problem I see with this is avoiding stuff like http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-896, which is certainly easier if the full build runs on 2.2.1/jdk1.5

Re: Scm, Surefire, Wagon migrate to git (please check) [was Plan for git migration]

2012-09-23 Thread Brett Porter
On 19/09/2012, at 11:40 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > BTW I have started a page here: > http://maven.apache.org/developers/conventions/git.html > > we could put some git tips and more conventions. > It would be good if the commit template respected this, which some tools (e.g. github, vim) use:

Re: Building plugins with java 1.7 and the test-harness

2012-09-23 Thread Brett Porter
I think both choices are fine. The risk-averse users on Maven 2.2.1 are probably also not on Java 7 :) Put the other way, requiring a bump to Maven 3 to build plugins on Java 7 sounds reasonable to me. On 24/09/2012, at 6:56 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > We have other developers to thin

[RESULT] [VOTE] release maven-javadoc-plugin version 2.9

2012-09-23 Thread Benson Margulies
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Hervé, Olivier, bimargulies, oching I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional co

[ANN] Maven Javadoc Plugin 2.9 Released

2012-09-23 Thread Benson Margulies
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Javadoc Plugin, version 2.9 The Maven Javadoc Plugin is a plugin that uses the javadoc tool for generating javadocs for the specified project. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/ You should specify the version

Re: [VOTE] Release Doxia Tools parent version 2 and Doxia Integration Tools version 1.5

2012-09-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 23 septembre 2012 15:41:49 Dennis Lundberg a écrit : > Hi, > > This is the first release of the Doxia Tools parent after the > restructuring of these components. It now works in the same way as the > parents for Plugins and Shared Components. > > Doxia Integration

Re: Building plugins with java 1.7 and the test-harness

2012-09-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi We have other developers to think about as well. Even though might be OK with requiring Maven 3 to build our plugins, the plugin testing stuff is used by many other plugins. Since they might not be OK with it, I think we should do a 1.3 release. On 2012-09-23 22:44, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: >

Building plugins with java 1.7 and the test-harness

2012-09-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
At the moment, most of the plugin it's don't run under java 7 (dont know about 1.6). The reasons for this seems to be largely that the version of easymock that is used in all released versions of plugin-testing is incompatible with java 7. And since it's easymock classextension, it looks like upgr

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release maven plugin testing 2.1

2012-09-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Re-spin coming soon. Kristian 2012/9/23 Kristian Rosenvold : > If you fix it on trunk I'll re-run. > > K > > Den 23. sep. 2012 kl. 05:07 skrev Igor Fedorenko : > >> There is a problem in maven-plugin-testing-harness I meant to fix right >> after I released 2.0 but it somehow slipped my mind. >>

Re: M2E - motivated plugin changes

2012-09-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
The only IDE that supports incremental behaviour in the core is Eclipse. The latest EAPs of IDEA, however, are starting to use the Eclipse compiler so IDEA may soon be able to leverage them. What we have works as the resources, modello, and plexus plugins have been using these APIs for a couple

Re: M2E - motivated plugin changes

2012-09-23 Thread Benson Margulies
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > runOnIncremental sounds interesting. > > Is this only for m2e or could this be useful for standard maven as well? If > so, I'd rather enhance the plugin.xml It looks to me as if our M2E-ish colleagues have tried hard to define an API that o

Re: M2E - motivated plugin changes

2012-09-23 Thread Mark Struberg
runOnIncremental sounds interesting. Is this only for m2e or could this be useful for standard maven as well? If so, I'd rather enhance the plugin.xml LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Benson Margulies > To: Maven Developers List > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 7

M2E - motivated plugin changes

2012-09-23 Thread Benson Margulies
http://wiki.eclipse.org/M2E_compatible_maven_plugins What is the collective thought on making these changes to core plugins? checkstyle springs to my mind. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional

[VOTE] Release Doxia Tools parent version 2 and Doxia Integration Tools version 1.5

2012-09-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, This is the first release of the Doxia Tools parent after the restructuring of these components. It now works in the same way as the parents for Plugins and Shared Components. Doxia Integration Tools moved from Shared Components to Doxia Tools in this release. We solved 5 issues: http://jira