Re: Getting the maven-plugins-ITs-m* jobs back on track again...

2012-09-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mardi 4 septembre 2012 21:59:28 Dennis Lundberg a écrit : > Hi all > > I'd like to try to get the Jenkins jobs maven-plugins-ITs-m2 and > maven-plugins-ITs-m3 back on track a gain, but I'm not sure how to. > Perhaps we can crack it together. Here's a summary of the current problems: +1000 I'm t

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Chris Graham
I have no desire to keep a copy of the entire repo locally. >From what I can see, the current SVN is well managed and well understood. I see little value in changing, other than to pander to the current fad in scm. -Chris On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > How's Git doing a

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
On 4 September 2012 14:29, Mark Struberg wrote: > just take as example that you like to checkout all maven core plugins in one > go because you like to do some refactoring/checks/upgrade. > That would require you to go into each plugin project and get the stuff from > there. And where would you

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Jesse McConnell
it is possible to have them all in one git repo and still release separately, we do it in a toolchain repository in jetty and use maven release plugin for it as well so its not _required_ that you split it all up by choosing git jesse -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Tue, Sep 4,

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Benson Margulies
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > just take as example that you like to checkout all maven core plugins in one > go because you like to do some refactoring/checks/upgrade. I see. So the fact that we have a single trunk in svn for all the plugins is the thing that isn't conve

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Mark Struberg
just take as example that you like to checkout all maven core plugins in one go because you like to do some refactoring/checks/upgrade. That would require you to go into each plugin project and get the stuff from there. And where would you put the aggregator pom for CI and development builds? Sa

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Benson Margulies
Mark, I disagree. Any group of modules that is released together can just have a git repo. What case do you have in mind where we'd need to fight with the git submodule madness? For others: if a project wants to move to git, the project must provide a sacrificial victim volunteer to help with git

Re: Moving our distrib to svnpub

2012-09-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
Back on this. I wonder about changing a bit the distrib directory tree ? The goal is to ease release. For voting period the candidate files can be committed to the correct tree here https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ (instead of scp to people.a.o) Then once the vote has passed releasing is si

Re: Getting the maven-plugins-ITs-m* jobs back on track again...

2012-09-04 Thread Robert Scholte
Op Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:59:28 +0200 schreef Dennis Lundberg : Hi all I'd like to try to get the Jenkins jobs maven-plugins-ITs-m2 and maven-plugins-ITs-m3 back on track a gain, but I'm not sure how to. Perhaps we can crack it together. Here's a summary of the current problems: maven-plugi

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Mark Struberg
And the Seam guys and a few others got pretty much stuck because the granularity level needs to be up front if you move to GIT. GIT is cool, but it is not as modular as SVN. git-submodules are still a farce and there is nothing else which allows modularisation. Don't get me wrong, I really like

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2012-09-04 22:10, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > On 2012-09-04 21:55, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> How's Git doing at Apache these days? > > A pilot was started some time ago, with a few volunteering projects. I > have heard anything about its progress in a while. I'll ask over @infra > and report back he

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Arnaud Héritier
jenkins does it (1 plugin = 1 repo ) and I sincerely see no solution to avoid that. Each plugin or each lib has its own lifecycle and requires to have its own git repo to be clean That's why on jenkins we have the IRC bot to manage them But it is easier on github because they provide many APIs to d

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/9/4 Andrew Waterman : > The drools guys did a really nice move from Subversion a few years back. > > http://blog.athico.com/2010/12/drools-migrated-to-git.html > > One of the key things they did, was reorganize their poms and project > structure. > > I'd be willing to help out. I think there

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Andrew Waterman
The drools guys did a really nice move from Subversion a few years back. http://blog.athico.com/2010/12/drools-migrated-to-git.html One of the key things they did, was reorganize their poms and project structure. I'd be willing to help out. I think there could be a lot more to this move than j

Re: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2012-09-04 21:55, Jason van Zyl wrote: > How's Git doing at Apache these days? A pilot was started some time ago, with a few volunteering projects. I have heard anything about its progress in a while. I'll ask over @infra and report back here. > Anyone interested in pursuing putting Maven in G

RE: Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 15:55 > > How's Git doing at Apache these days? > > Anyone interested in pursuing putting Maven in Git as the > canonical SCM? Comments from the peanut gallery: It would make it very nice to contribute back.

Getting the maven-plugins-ITs-m* jobs back on track again...

2012-09-04 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi all I'd like to try to get the Jenkins jobs maven-plugins-ITs-m2 and maven-plugins-ITs-m3 back on track a gain, but I'm not sure how to. Perhaps we can crack it together. Here's a summary of the current problems: maven-plugins-ITs-m2 We only have one plugin failing here, Maven Repository Plu

Git as the canonical SCM

2012-09-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
How's Git doing at Apache these days? Anyone interested in pursuing putting Maven in Git as the canonical SCM? Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder & CTO, Sonatype Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl ---

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-shade-plugin 2.0 -- attempt 2

2012-09-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Dan On Sep 2, 2012, at 7:03 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > We solved 4 issues: > > ** Bug >* [MSHADE-103] - maven-shade-plugin does not resolve from > user-defined repositories >* [MSHADE-124] - Need better plan for getting > dependency-reduced-pom.xml out of basedir >* [MSHADE

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-shade-plugin 2.0 -- attempt 2

2012-09-04 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Olivier Lamy > To: Maven Developers List > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:15 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven-shade-plugin 2.0 -- attempt 2 > > +1 > > 2012/9/3 Benson Margulies : >> We solved 4 issues: >> >> ** Bug

[ANN] Maven EAR Plugin 2.8 Released

2012-09-04 Thread Stephane Nicoll
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven EAR Plugin, version 2.8 The plugin generates a JavaEE Enterprise Archive (EAR) file. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-ear-plugin/ You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration: org.apache.maven.plugin

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-shade-plugin 2.0 -- attempt 2

2012-09-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2012/9/3 Benson Margulies : > We solved 4 issues: > > ** Bug > * [MSHADE-103] - maven-shade-plugin does not resolve from > user-defined repositories > * [MSHADE-124] - Need better plan for getting > dependency-reduced-pom.xml out of basedir > * [MSHADE-130] - Mark mojo as threadSafe