java-annotations with groovy

2012-08-22 Thread Ben Tatham
I am trying to use java-annotations (not javadoc) on a Mojo written in groovy, as per [1]. (I need them so I can subclass the mojo in other, multiple plugins, as annotations are, in theory, much easier than the Maven 2 ways of doing plugin extension). However, the maven-plugin-plugin 3.1 does not

Re: svn commit: r1376120 - in /maven/sandbox/trunk/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/scmpublish: AbstractScmPublishMojo.java ScmPublishPublishMojo.java

2012-08-22 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
this time, the comment is correct :) see the "for ( String name : deleted )" loop with a test the benefit is that modules protection is always on, it's not an option Regards Hervé Le mercredi 22 août 2012 23:33:22 Olivier Lamy a écrit : > Not sure the comment is correct in fact :-). > I just wa

Re: svn commit: r1376120 - in /maven/sandbox/trunk/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/scmpublish: AbstractScmPublishMojo.java ScmPublishPublishMojo.java

2012-08-22 Thread Olivier Lamy
Not sure the comment is correct in fact :-). I just wanted to have an option to not delete files (safe option for testing purpose) 2012/8/22 Hervé BOUTEMY : > IMHO, this one is not needed: ScmPublishPublishScmMojo.update takes care of > modules already (see javadoc) > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le m

Re: svn commit: r1376120 - in /maven/sandbox/trunk/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/scmpublish: AbstractScmPublishMojo.java ScmPublishPublishMojo.java

2012-08-22 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
IMHO, this one is not needed: ScmPublishPublishScmMojo.update takes care of modules already (see javadoc) Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 22 août 2012 16:13:35 ol...@apache.org a écrit : > Author: olamy > Date: Wed Aug 22 16:13:34 2012 > New Revision: 1376120 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?r

Re: [fluido] including glyphicons in the fluido distribution package

2012-08-22 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
> Looks this quoted sentence says clearly it's ASF 2.0 license and > nothing required. > BTW we can add credit/link back here > http://maven.apache.org/skins/maven-fluido-skin/ +1 this seems fair and easy Regards, Hervé - To uns

Re: Moving our distrib to svnpub

2012-08-22 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
IIUC, it's https, not http :) no objection here, just documentation to update [1] Regards, Hervé [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-core-release.html Le mercredi 22 août 2012 00:36:53 Olivier Lamy a écrit : > Hi, > Before the end of the year, all Apache projects must move the

Re: [fluido] versioning the produced css/js

2012-08-22 Thread Robert Scholte
Nice! -Robert Op Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:44:56 +0200 schreef Simone Tripodi : Thanks for the feedbacks guys, I just quickly took care about it, see MSKINS-61 best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://ww

Re: [fluido] Upgrading JQuery from 1.7.1 to 1.8.0

2012-08-22 Thread Simone Tripodi
Good to know and thanks a lot for the quick reply Olivier! So, I am going to update JQuery in fluido - I honestly already prepared the update in case of positive reply, I just need to commit it :P Merci, a trés bientôt, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejour

Re: [fluido] Upgrading JQuery from 1.7.1 to 1.8.0

2012-08-22 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/8/22 Simone Tripodi : > Hi all guys, > > are you aware of any side effect we could have if upgrading JQuery > from 1.7.1 to 1.8.0 in fluido? Nope :-) I upgraded a project to bootstrap 2.1.0 and jQuery 1.8.0 and no issues (issues are with jqueryui) > > TIA, all the best! > -Simo > > http://peo

Re: [fluido] versioning the produced css/js

2012-08-22 Thread Simone Tripodi
Thanks for the feedbacks guys, I just quickly took care about it, see MSKINS-61 best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Tony Chemit wrote: > On Wed, 22 Au

Re: [fluido] versioning the produced css/js

2012-08-22 Thread Tony Chemit
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:22:56 +0200 Olivier Lamy wrote: > 2012/8/22 Simone Tripodi : > > Hi all guys, > > > > time ago Robert and I were discussing about versioning the produced > > minified css/js to avoid browser cache conflicts, I mean, ATM all > > fluido skin versions refer to > > > > $relativ

Re: [fluido] versioning the produced css/js

2012-08-22 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/8/22 Simone Tripodi : > Hi all guys, > > time ago Robert and I were discussing about versioning the produced > minified css/js to avoid browser cache conflicts, I mean, ATM all > fluido skin versions refer to > > $relativePath/js/apache-maven-fluido.min.js > $relativePath/js/apache-maven-fluid

[fluido] versioning the produced css/js

2012-08-22 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, time ago Robert and I were discussing about versioning the produced minified css/js to avoid browser cache conflicts, I mean, ATM all fluido skin versions refer to $relativePath/js/apache-maven-fluido.min.js $relativePath/js/apache-maven-fluido.min.cs that could cheat users when upg

Re: [fluido] including glyphicons in the fluido distribution package

2012-08-22 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/8/22 Simone Tripodi : > Hi all, > > from TW Bootstrap page: > > "Glyphicons Halflings are normally not available for free, but an > arrangement between Bootstrap and the Glyphicons creators have made > this possible at not cost to you as developers. As a thank you, we ask > you to include an o

Re: [fluido] including glyphicons in the fluido distribution package

2012-08-22 Thread Stephen Connolly
Should we ping one of the legal lists? On Wednesday, 22 August 2012, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all, > > from TW Bootstrap page: > > "Glyphicons Halflings are normally not available for free, but an > arrangement between Bootstrap and the Glyphicons creators have made > this possible at not cost