On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:04:19 +0200
Olivier Lamy wrote:
+1
thanks.
tony.
> +1
>
> 2012/8/15 Stephane Nicoll :
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 9 issues:
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11145&styleName=Html&version=17177
> >
> > There are still around 30 issues left in J
On Friday, 17 August 2012, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
> Quoting Stephen Connolly (2012-08-17 13:32:54)
> > If in 50 years time that means that there is still some Maven plugins
> that
> > depend on some of the published Maven APIs from Maven 2.0 then that is a
> > success on behalf of the Maven
Quoting Stephen Connolly (2012-08-17 13:32:54)
> If in 50 years time that means that there is still some Maven plugins that
> depend on some of the published Maven APIs from Maven 2.0 then that is a
> success on behalf of the Maven developers, not a failure to force people to
> upgrade.
I honestl
> (Making your JAR files uncompressed and then the WAR file compressed
> sounds weird to me...?)
This may actually make sense since zipping an uncompressed ZIP file
will be more like tar/gz and will result in better compression
performance (because zip dictionaries are contiguous over multiple
fil
In the following patch
https://github.com/krosenvold/plexus-archiver/commit/e525cf9ad07ef2e96b1c4281945c06e2f59f7d5a
I added sniffing of the file ZIP header to the "archive" function, and
if the file being added is already zipped, I store it instead of
deflating it
in the archive (avoiding recompre
I have 2 remarks to add:
1. even if a plugin has a dependency on an old Maven core artifact, it's at
compile time but not runtime: the artifact used at runtime is the artifact
from the actual Maven version used, the old artifact isn't even downloaded.
Then there is really no problem with plugin
On 17 August 2012 12:32, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> On 17 August 2012 11:33, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
>> Quoting Jason van Zyl (2012-07-30 17:43:13)
>> > On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>> >
>> > > The only reason to do this from my PoV is if the plugin requires
>> featur
On 17 August 2012 11:33, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Quoting Jason van Zyl (2012-07-30 17:43:13)
> > On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> >
> > > The only reason to do this from my PoV is if the plugin requires
> features
> > > only available in Maven 3.
> > >
> > > There are
Quoting Chris Graham (2012-07-30 15:43:31)
> I work with a lot of older (sometimes out of service software [customers pay
> a fortune but are prepared to live with it]) so I'm generally a fan of the
> lowest common denominator.
Indeed nothing wrong with it
>
> What do you hope to achieve by the
Quoting Jason van Zyl (2012-07-30 17:43:13)
> On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
> > The only reason to do this from my PoV is if the plugin requires features
> > only available in Maven 3.
> >
> > There are still a significant number of users who use Maven 2.2.1, yeah I
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo
