Whilst Java6 may be soon coming to EOL, I am still supporting many large
corporates on Java 1.4 - corporates do not necessarily move quickly - not if
their solution works.
Just something to consider from the real world.
-Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On 09/08/2012, at 1:13 AM, Tamás Cservenák wr
On 09/08/2012, at 5:43 AM, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> In short: Java6 EOL is coming in months now, users running 1.5 and below
> should really consider an upgrade.
> A bit longer: Java6 1st release happened in 2006, 6 years ago. In our
> profession, that is around 70 years old, 6 years corresponds
HI,
JDK6's EOL is Feb 2013
(http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html), so it's near.
Markku
On 8.8.2012 23:46, Robert Scholte wrote:
In theory you're right about the timing, but the facts are different.
It seems like the larger the company, the slower the time. I've seen
compa
I need help.
In order to provide instructions [1] to publish release documentation with
svnpubsub, I'm trying to use httpd rewrite rule instead of svn symlink, since
it should be easier to maintain.
I'm trying to write a sample rule [2] to have latest clean plugin release [3]
accessible as def
+1
Hervé
Le mardi 7 août 2012 03:03:18 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18712&styleName=Tex
> t&projectId=10541
>
> A couple of improvements worth noting:
>
> Of general interest is the fix of
> http://jira.co
For what its worth, Java 6's EOL just got pushed out till Feb 2013:
https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/java_6_eol_h_h
Mark
On 9/08/2012, at 7:43 AM, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> In short: Java6 EOL is coming in months now, users running 1.5 and below
> should really consider an upgrade.
Perso, in 2012 I don't see any issue being 1.6 required.
Especially for a component which is not used in core neither in any plugin.
2012/8/8 Robert Scholte :
> In theory you're right about the timing, but the facts are different. It
> seems like the larger the company, the slower the time. I've s
Hi,
I don't want to seem unpolite, but I write again since I got no response
and thought the mail got maybe lost. Is there a release for the maven
installer plugin in the near future planned?
Kind regards,
Felix
Am 2012-08-01 09:47, schrieb Felix Mayerhuber:
Hi @all,
I hope I'm in the corr
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Hervé Boutemy, Kristian Rosenvold, Stephen Connolly,
Vincent Siveton, Wayne Fay, Olivier Lamy
+1 (non binding): Tony Chemit
I will continue the release process.
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/ol
My +1
2012/8/5 Olivier Lamy :
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Parent 11.
> Staging repository is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheapache-120/
> Staged documentation: http://maven.apache.org/pom/asf-11/
>
> Diff from previous release:
> http://svn.apache.org/vi
+1
2012/8/7 Kristian Rosenvold :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18712&styleName=Text&projectId=10541
>
> A couple of improvements worth noting:
>
> Of general interest is the fix of
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-894, which shou
In theory you're right about the timing, but the facts are different. It
seems like the larger the company, the slower the time. I've seen
companies still using jdk1.4 because they had a lot of trouble to upgrade
to a newer version of an application server.
The version of this JDK is not rela
In short: Java6 EOL is coming in months now, users running 1.5 and below
should really consider an upgrade.
A bit longer: Java6 1st release happened in 2006, 6 years ago. In our
profession, that is around 70 years old, 6 years corresponds to -- for
example in optics (first known lenses are about 70
What's the reason for the "Bumped MI to Java6 level."?
Looks like a potential issue to me (assuming a lot of projects still use
java5)
-Robert
Op Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:29:41 +0200 schreef Olivier Lamy :
Nice changes.
+1 to merge that.
Maybe some jiras entries to create :-)
--
Olivier
Le 7 ao
Nice changes.
+1 to merge that.
Maybe some jiras entries to create :-)
--
Olivier
Le 7 août 2012 23:21, "Tamás Cservenák" a écrit :
> Hi there,
>
> Olivier did a great job of releasing Maven Indexer 4.1.3 that bumped Lucene
> to 3.6.1.
>
> But, having Lucene 3.6.1 in MI makes us now possible to
15 matches
Mail list logo
