On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Chris Graham wrote:
> > Why make it so hard?
> > Why cann't you filter the resources and/or package them via the assembly
> plugin.
> >
> > Remember that plugins still run during the release process, so why n
:-(
I'm off for two weeks holiday in India, so I'll be off the grid (mostly).
So, I'll look at it when I get back to work (which is where I need to test
it).
-Chris
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I have just fixed some issues.
> Can you test last SNAPSHOT (I'm not
+1 - included dependency-tree 2.0 into netbeans, appears to work.
Upgrade most likely solves a bunch of issues in dependency graphs.
thanks.
Milos
PS: so technically my vote is just on dependency-tree, I haven't
checked the rest
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1
> Great t
+1
Hervé
Le jeudi 2 août 2012 20:19:51 Stephane Nicoll a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 11 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11147&styleName=H
> tml&version=15855
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigato
Oh yes; surefire requires 3.x to build, but we could run the IT's with 2.2.1
Den 3. aug. 2012 kl. 20:15 skrev Olivier Lamy :
> Grhh. My bad.
> It's now fixed. I have make mavenHome to use for it tests more configurable:
> * -DmavenHomeUsed= path to a maven 2.x home
> * or -Pmaven-2.2.1 this profi
Hold 2.12.2; I have something cool to add this weekend...
Den 3. aug. 2012 kl. 20:15 skrev Olivier Lamy :
> Grhh. My bad.
> It's now fixed. I have make mavenHome to use for it tests more configurable:
> * -DmavenHomeUsed= path to a maven 2.x home
> * or -Pmaven-2.2.1 this profile will download a
Grhh. My bad.
It's now fixed. I have make mavenHome to use for it tests more configurable:
* -DmavenHomeUsed= path to a maven 2.x home
* or -Pmaven-2.2.1 this profile will download a maven 2.2.1 distrib
and use it for integration tests.
I will add a jenkins job to run with -Pmaven-2.2.1.
I will st
We just had https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-896, and for
some reason the
/**
* Map of project artifacts.
*
* @parameter expression="${project.artifactMap}"
* @required
* @readonly
*/
private Map projectArtifactMap;
that was converted to :
/**
+1
Great to dependency:tree back for maven3 !!!
2012/8/2 Hervé BOUTEMY :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 + 7 + 8 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761&styleName=Html&version=14540
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11142&styleName=Html&version=1
+1
2012/8/2 Stephane Nicoll :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 11 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11147&styleName=Html&version=15855
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11147&status=1
>
>
Hi,
Maybe the comment is not correct and the issue title need to updated.
But now there is a skip field implemented (it's not automatic !)
2012/8/3 Stephen Connolly :
> I hope http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSOURCES-56 does not impact people
> uploading to the central repository where the valida
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Herve Boutemy, Vincent Siveton, Olivier Lamy
+1 (non binding): Tony Chemit.
I will continue the release process.
Thanks!
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Hi,
I have just fixed some issues.
Can you test last SNAPSHOT (I'm not a rar user :-) ).
Thanks!
--
Olivier
2012/8/2 Chris Graham :
> Hi All.
>
> Just a reminder. :-)
>
> -Chris
>
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> I will take care of that next week.
>>
>> --
>> Ol
Greetings,
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Nimm wrote:
> I use dependencies and created war file...
> but after deploying that it shows error... i think it is the problem with
> versions.. but i don't know what jar versions need to change
> and please give me those dependencies also.
> I incl
Hi...
I use dependencies and created war file...
but after deploying that it shows error... i think it is the problem with
versions.. but i don't know what jar versions need to change
and please give me those dependencies also.
I including my POM.xml also
http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
What's the benefit of this approach rather than just having the user
adding the dependencies directly to the plugin (execution)
declaration? To me it seems as it would be the same number of xml rows
in the pom and it would make the plugin coding a lot easier.
/Anders
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:56 P
On 08/02/2012 04:58 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
not have a dependency on some library in the plugin itself but rely on it being
declared as a dependency in the Maven project where the plugin is bound. That
made it
totally controllable by the project.
If the build-time code would not normally alr
I hope http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSOURCES-56 does not impact people
uploading to the central repository where the validation rules (when I last
checked) require at least an empty sources artifact be deployed.
I am not seeing a parameter on
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-source-plugin-
18 matches
Mail list logo