Benson Margulies wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I've dug a hole (reported by) MSHADE-123 and I don't know what to do about
> this.
>
> I dug the hole via the changes to move the default location of the
> dependency reduced pom from the project basedir to target. Having the
> drp in the basedir led to chaos
Here's my proposed plan.
1) I do something about MSHADE-123: move the default back to basedir.
2) I release 1.7.1.
3) You move the next version to 2.0 or 3.0, and fix MSHADE-112.
4) I apply the patch to MSHADE-103 that requires us to depend on Maven 3.
5) anyone who really wants a fix for Mave
Hi,
I don't know if you have a look @ MSHADE-112
Basically the goal is to be able to pass more and more parameters to the Shader.
This need to change
-void shade( Set jars, File uberJar, List filters,
List relocators,
-List resourceTransformers )
+void shade( ShadeRequest
of course you could just do
mvn b2:prep-release release:prepare release:perform
and have your plugin do the dancing games... but IIRC the pom checks
take place on the loaded MavenProject and not on the on-disk pom
On 26 June 2012 10:58, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Ahh, yes... I remember now, I ha
Ahh, yes... I remember now, I had some theoretical use cases for a
transformationGoals (or prePreparationGoals) but no concrete use
cases... until now.
I think you just about have a valid use case for extending the
lifecycle to have an optional set of goals which runs between updating
the pom vers
Actually, I'm not sure...
I have a very special use case, let me try to explain it:
* We implemented a maven core extension (see ${maven.home}/lib/ext/), called b2.
* b2 is able to generate pom.xml files from plain eclipse plugin projects with
all the necessary configuration to build it with Mav
95% of use cases that I have seen can be reached by using
preparationGoals to invoke an additional plugin or mix in an
additional profile
99.9% of use cases that I have seen can be reached by using
preparationGoals and completionGoals to tidy up afterwards.
Of the remaining 0.1% of use cases that
Hi,
is there a way to extend the release phases of the DefaultReleaseManager?
I'd like to add a custom release phase to the list of the release managers
prepare phases. The implementation of the custom phase should update some
project specific files during the release preparation.
Kind regards
Just applied.
Thanks !
--
Olivier
2012/6/26 Tony Chemit :
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:36:51 +0200
> "Robert Scholte" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've discovered the cause of the HelpMojo plugin, Olivier has fixed it
>> (thanks!).
>> I have verified all the issues I've mentioned before and can confirm thes