+1 non binding - from 5 minutes down to 3 for my multimodule build. w00t.
On Sun Apr 29 11:06:18 2012, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
+1
tested on Maven core: compile time reduced from 16 seconds to only 8
great!
thank you
Hervé
Le vendredi 27 avril 2012 23:09:35 Olivier Lamy a écrit :
Hi,
I'd lik
+1
Hervé
Le vendredi 27 avril 2012 23:48:19 Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 19 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11146&styleName=H
> tml&version=16489
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNav
+1
tested on Maven core: compile time reduced from 16 seconds to only 8
great!
thank you
Hervé
Le vendredi 27 avril 2012 23:09:35 Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin 2.4.
>
> We fixed: 13 issues (http://s.apache.org/MCOMPILER-2.4)
>
> Staging reposi
rat fine, deps fine, pgp fine, artifacts look ok. Source Release [1] also ok
+1
LieGrue,
strub
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-112/org/apache/maven/scm/maven-scm/1.7/maven-scm-1.7-source-release.zip
- Original Message -
> From: Hervé BOUTEMY
> To: Mave
Greetings,
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:35 PM, John Casey wrote:
> I don't want to have dozens of these things popping up, one per
> {surefire,release,plugin-tools,shared-{*}, etc}...that seems like it'll
> cause a lot of maintenance problems. OTOH, having a single large git repo is
> probably not r
On 4/28/12 12:06 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
I'm a little late, but needed time to think more on my comments :)
Le lundi 9 avril 2012 17:27:09 John Casey a écrit :
Hi all,
I finally have some cycles free to work on Maven, and I'd like to spend
some time thinking about how we might tackle some of
I'm a little late, but needed time to think more on my comments :)
Le lundi 9 avril 2012 17:27:09 John Casey a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I finally have some cycles free to work on Maven, and I'd like to spend
> some time thinking about how we might tackle some of the bigger-picture
> things.
>
> Per
I'm still trying to put a rough shape on a new artifact API for Maven
(been slammed at work this week). I think I'm leaning toward the notion
of separating the API(s) from the implementation(s) and putting them on
separate release cycles. This way, we can publish a stable set of
interfaces, exc
On Apr 27, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> yes, +1 for the first step - ie annotations for plugin.xml generation
Yes, this is the wisest, most compatible way to go. It can easily be done using
ASM to process the annotations and produce the plugin.xml. Works fine. This
also allows peopl
