Re: Maven for TIBCO projects

2012-04-16 Thread Wayne Fay
> We are looking for feature in Maven if we can able to automate > build & deployment tasks for TIBCO projects, your advise is > appreciated on this. You should probably ask this question in a TIBCO forum or possibly the Maven Users list. This list is reserved for discussion of the development of

Maven for TIBCO projects

2012-04-16 Thread Shukur.Shaik
Hi We are looking for feature in Maven if we can able to automate build & deployment tasks for TIBCO projects, your advise is appreciated on this. Thanks Shukur This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and pr

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.3

2012-04-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 from me On 2012-04-14 22:22, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 12 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11624&styleName=Html&version=13714 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=t

Re: Maven don't include index.jsp

2012-04-16 Thread titans
Thank you!!! -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Maven-don-t-include-index-jsp-tp5644304p5644716.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev

Re: Version scheme question

2012-04-16 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Or you could try something total different like providing a stable API of your library while providing two adapters for Vadin6 and Vadin7, so you have myvadin-api -> myvadin6-impl -> myvadin7-impl and let the user of your library choose during runtime whether they want to use vadin 6 or 7. This

Re: Version scheme question

2012-04-16 Thread Wayne Fay
> Eventually, I'd like to release a proper 1.0. That's the whole idea. How > can we keep a consistent version scheme in such a case? Another approach I've seen (and generally like) incorporates the API number in the artifact id itself and not as part of the version. I see this as being a superior

Re: Version scheme question

2012-04-16 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Wayne On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Wayne Fay wrote: > > * 0.3 is Vaadin 6-based, 0.4 is Vaadin 7-based, 0.5 is Vaadin6-based, > etc.: > > It's weird because the features of the library should be exactly the > same > > (the only difference is the underlying API that is being used) > > How abo

Re: Version scheme question

2012-04-16 Thread Wayne Fay
> * 0.3 is Vaadin 6-based, 0.4 is Vaadin 7-based, 0.5 is Vaadin6-based, etc.: >  It's weird because the features of the library should be exactly the same > (the only difference is the underlying API that is being used) How about 0.7 becomes Vaadin 7-based? Not sure what happens when Vaadin 10.x

Version scheme question

2012-04-16 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Hi, I am having this question for another project I am working on and since it (obviously) uses Maven, I wonder if I could collect some feedback over here. It's halfway between user and dev. Apologizes if I sent to the wrong list :) Assume a projet providing a library utility over a framework (he

Re: Maven don't include index.jsp

2012-04-16 Thread Robert Scholte
You're not using the default folder for the webapp sources. So either change your folder structure (using src/main/webapp instead of WebContent) or configure http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-war-plugin/war-mojo.html#warSourceDirectory Robert Op Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:19:12 +0200 schreef t

Maven don't include index.jsp

2012-04-16 Thread titans
Hello. I'm doing a training project on Eclipse with Spring MVC and Hibernate. The problem is that I am exporting to the Eclipse WAR file, but TomCat sees it as one error. I decided to try to compile the project in Maven. However, after compiling I see in war only archive of the folder WEB-INF (web.

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.3

2012-04-16 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 Robert Op Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:53:57 +0200 schreef Emmanuel Venisse : +1 Emmanuel On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, We solved 12 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11624&styleName=Html&version=13714 There are still a coup

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.3

2012-04-16 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 12 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11624&styleName=Html&version=13714 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavig

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.3

2012-04-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2012/4/14 Dennis Lundberg : > Hi, > > We solved 12 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11624&styleName=Html&version=13714 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11624&status=1 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.3

2012-04-16 Thread Tony Chemit
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:22:20 +0200 Dennis Lundberg wrote: +1 (non-binding) Thanks. Tony > Hi, > > We solved 12 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11624&styleName=Html&version=13714 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus