Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Le samedi 31 mars 2012 08:24:50 Lukas Theussl a écrit :
The other way round was it? doxia-book into Doxia Tools and
doxia-maven-plugin into Sitetools.
-Lukas
no, Tools can depend on Sitetools, but not the other way
Right, didn't think about the dependencies. I'd move b
Le samedi 31 mars 2012 08:24:50 Lukas Theussl a écrit :
> The other way round was it? doxia-book into Doxia Tools and
> doxia-maven-plugin into Sitetools.
>
> -Lukas
no, Tools can depend on Sitetools, but not the other way
the other ways would be do move both modules to Tools or Sitetools
but not
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
ok so:
1. doxia-book from Doxia to Doxia Sitetools,
same artifact coordinates: org.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-book,
1.2 is from Doxia tree, 1.3-SNAPSHOT will be from Doxia Sitetools
2. doxia-maven-plugin from Doxia to Doxia Tools,
same artifact coordinates: org.ap
ok so:
1. doxia-book from Doxia to Doxia Sitetools,
same artifact coordinates: org.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-book,
1.2 is from Doxia tree, 1.3-SNAPSHOT will be from Doxia Sitetools
2. doxia-maven-plugin from Doxia to Doxia Tools,
same artifact coordinates: org.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-maven
hi, i want to install maven3 and when i execute this Command "mvn
archetype:create -DgroupId=testapp -DartifactId=testapp" i receive this
error:
Code: Select all[ERROR] No plugin found for prefix 'archetype' in the
current project and in the
plugin groups [org.mortbay.jetty, org.apache.maven.plugi
hi, i want to install maven3 and when i execute this Command "mvn
archetype:create -DgroupId=testapp -DartifactId=testapp" i receive this
error:
Code: Select all[ERROR] No plugin found for prefix 'archetype' in the
current project and in the
plugin groups [org.mortbay.jetty, org.apache.maven.plugi
True. But that is for another day, as those changes need to be looked at in
the light of all of the CMS systems supported, including those in the
non-apache codebase.
Yes, I do see the need for a higher level of abstraction needed, as the
original API's were very much built around CVS, later SVN a
Hi,
Not every SCM is repository-based.
I see more and more differences between SCM's.
Should we split it into Client/Server versus Distributed model?
-Robert
Op Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:46:51 +0200 schreef Chris Graham
:
Heh. Done!
-Chris
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2012-03-29 09:13, Lukas Theussl wrote:
I agree that they don't belong into core, but I rather thought of moving
them into doxia-tools instead. Not sure what is better.
This was my thought also.
OTOH, neither book nor maven-plugin have been maintained (AFAIK) sinc
Heh. Done!
-Chris
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> just do it in your coming patch :-)
>
> 2012/3/30 Chris Graham :
> > Any ideas of how to get to initialised loggers (from the plexus
> container)
> > in this method?
> > My only option so far, is a new DefaultLog().
> >
>
just do it in your coming patch :-)
2012/3/30 Chris Graham :
> Any ideas of how to get to initialised loggers (from the plexus container)
> in this method?
> My only option so far, is a new DefaultLog().
>
> I'd perfer to use the normal ConsoleLogger etc as set up by the container,
> and available
11 matches
Mail list logo
