[PROPOSAL] move doxia-book and doxia-maven-plugin from Doxia base to Doxia Sitetools

2012-03-28 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
while working on the relations between components, I finally found why there was something I didn't understand for a long time about Doxia suite structure: Doxia base contains book support through a plugin, but Doxia base doesn't contain documents support -- it's Doxia Sitetools. So we have a c

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge the Doxia site into the Maven site

2012-03-28 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le jeudi 29 mars 2012 08:11:58 Lukas Theussl a écrit : > Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > yes, that's what I meant > > my point is that it is then published only on release: either we wait > > for next release, or we copy the actual report by hand as if it was > > generated during the 1.2 release > > I do

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge the Doxia site into the Maven site

2012-03-28 Thread Lukas Theussl
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: yes, that's what I meant my point is that it is then published only on release: either we wait for next release, or we copy the actual report by hand as if it was generated during the 1.2 release I don't get the point: the jira report is always generated for a given rele

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge the Doxia site into the Maven site

2012-03-28 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
yes, that's what I meant my point is that it is then published only on release: either we wait for next release, or we copy the actual report by hand as if it was generated during the 1.2 release Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 28 mars 2012 21:36:47 Dennis Lundberg a écrit : > On 2012-03-28 08:35,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge the Doxia site into the Maven site

2012-03-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi Ah, I hadn't thought about the menu. You are right. On 2012-03-28 07:11, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > The Doxia site expert is Vincent Siveton: I hope he can express his opinion > > Doxia (base + sitetools + tools) deserves IMHO the dedicated menus from the > actual Doxia site [1] to let people un

Re: [PROPOSAL] Merge the Doxia site into the Maven site

2012-03-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2012-03-28 08:35, Lukas Theussl wrote: > > The JIRA report should go into the doxia sub-site (and corresponding > doxia-sitetools, etc), then you link to that from the base site for each > sub-project. WDYT? Yup, that sounds like a good plan. > > -Lukas > > > Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >> notice

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Fluido Skin 1.2.1 based on RC1

2012-03-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I'm opening a thread vote today for releasing Apache Maven Fluido Skin > 1.2.1, based on RC1 > > We solved 3 issues: > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11430&styleName=Html&version=1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Fluido Skin 1.2.1 based on RC1

2012-03-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
Salut Hervé! indeed, looks like the upgrade to Bootstrap2 is not painless as I originally thought - anyway, I'll try as much as I can to follow the "release early && often" mantra :) All the best and thanks a lot everybody for reviewing! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simo