Hi Manfred,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Manfred Moser wrote:
> Jos,
>
> I agree with you in the sense that any open source project that cares about
> a wide user base should try to provide packages of its software that are
> useful to as many people as possible.
Thanks.
>
> Therefore e.g. t
Jos,
I agree with you in the sense that any open source project that cares
about a wide user base should try to provide packages of its software
that are useful to as many people as possible.
Therefore e.g. the Jenkins effort to offer all sorts of installs is
laudible imho.
However for Mav
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> I t
+1
On 19 March 2012 10:18, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I'm opening a thread vote today for releasing Apache Maven Fluido Skin
> 1.2, based on RC1
>
> We solved 7 issues:
> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11430&styleName=Html&version=18296
>
> There are still
On 19 March 2012 21:20, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> I think if s
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I think if some 3rd party wants to provide an RPM have at it. I don't
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>> I think if some 3rd party wants to provide an RPM have at it. I don't think
>>> this is something we want to create or support.
On Mar 19, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> I think if some 3rd party wants to provide an RPM have at it. I don't think
>> this is something we want to create or support.
> [snip]
>
> Any reason why not, especially when it's easy t
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>> I think if some 3rd party wants to provide an RPM have at it. I don't think
>>> this is something we want to create or supp
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> I think if some 3rd party wants to provide an RPM have at it. I don't think
>> this is something we want to create or support.
> [snip]
>
> Any reason why not, especially when it's easy
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> I think if some 3rd party wants to provide an RPM have at it. I don't think
> this is something we want to create or support.
[snip]
Any reason why not, especially when it's easy to do so? It lowers the
bar for users to deploy Maven.
Jos
I think if some 3rd party wants to provide an RPM have at it. I don't think
this is something we want to create or support.
On Mar 19, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
>> wr
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:18:57 +0100
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I'm opening a thread vote today for releasing Apache Maven Fluido Skin
> 1.2, based on RC1
+1 (non binding)
Thanks ,
Tony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
>> wrote:
>>> Another thing I should have pointed out right away, but forgot is that
>>> alternative way would be to create rpms
+1
-Robert
Op Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:48:43 +0100 schreef Emmanuel Venisse
:
+1
Emmanuel
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
Hi all guys,
I'm opening a thread vote today for releasing Apache Maven Fluido Skin
1.2, based on RC1
We solved 7 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
> wrote:
>> Another thing I should have pointed out right away, but forgot is that
>> alternative way would be to create rpms directly out of upstream maven
>> release with bundled dependen
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
wrote:
> Another thing I should have pointed out right away, but forgot is that
> alternative way would be to create rpms directly out of upstream maven
> release with bundled dependencies and all that. I know most people on
> this list would f
+1
Emmanuel
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I'm opening a thread vote today for releasing Apache Maven Fluido Skin
> 1.2, based on RC1
>
> We solved 7 issues:
>
> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11430&styleName=Html&version=182
Hi all guys,
I'm opening a thread vote today for releasing Apache Maven Fluido Skin
1.2, based on RC1
We solved 7 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11430&styleName=Html&version=18296
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure
Quoting Jos Backus (2012-03-16 19:55:31)
>Hi Stanislav,
>
>On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
> wrote:
>> Quoting Jos Backus (2012-03-15 21:04:00)
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I'm trying to install Maven 3 in automatically generated CentOS VM
>>>images, and having Maven 3 and plugins available
20 matches
Mail list logo
