Re: IT repair

2011-12-10 Thread Benson Margulies
I have a clue as to what happened here. The commit quoted below added 'it' to the artifactids of a number of IT plugins to shut up errors in the log. I suppose that the four that I fixed tonight were oversights in here, which were masked by the old versions sitting in various repos. --

IT repair

2011-12-10 Thread Benson Margulies
In spite of Jason's sage advice, I am about to commit a change to a historical IT. I can't see what else to do. The IT seems simply broken, and I am stumped for an explanation of why it was passing on Jenkins until this afternoon. It never passed on either of my local systems. The test is the test

Re: Running the integration tests locally

2011-12-10 Thread Benson Margulies
At this point, the following tests fail locally for me. mng3746POMPropertyOverride(itMNG3746_UsingDefaultSystemProperty)..FAILURE (14.8 s) mng3746POMPropertyOverride(itMNG3746_UsingCLIProperty)..FAILURE (4.2 s) mng3716AggregatorForking(itMNG3716).FAILURE (5.0 s) mng3710

Re: So, the 1.7 run of the it's has been failing for days

2011-12-10 Thread Olivier Lamy
I have changed some setup regarding local repo used. Should fix issues. 2011/12/10 Benson Margulies : > https://builds.apache.org/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.7/88/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mav

Re: Running the integration tests locally

2011-12-10 Thread Olivier Lamy
2011/12/10 Barrie Treloar : > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> 2011/12/10 Benson Margulies : >>> I have yet to figure out how to get the core integration tests to pass >>> on my local machine even when they are passing on Jenkins. >>> >>> On my Mac, at least one likes to fai

Re: Running the integration tests locally

2011-12-10 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > 2011/12/10 Benson Margulies : >> I have yet to figure out how to get the core integration tests to pass >> on my local machine even when they are passing on Jenkins. >> >> On my Mac, at least one likes to fail due to the discrepancy between >>

Re: Remaining IT failures for MNG-5214

2011-12-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Dec 10, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >> On Dec 10, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >>> However, in 3043, the consumer leaves out the classifier from the >>> dependency specification. Is anyone willing to ex

Re: Running the integration tests locally

2011-12-10 Thread Olivier Lamy
2011/12/10 Benson Margulies : > I have yet to figure out how to get the core integration tests to pass > on my local machine even when they are passing on Jenkins. > > On my Mac, at least one likes to fail due to the discrepancy between > /tmp and /private/tmp. which one ? this should have been fix

So, the 1.7 run of the it's has been failing for days

2011-12-10 Thread Benson Margulies
https://builds.apache.org/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.7/88/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Running the integration tests locally

2011-12-10 Thread Benson Margulies
I have yet to figure out how to get the core integration tests to pass on my local machine even when they are passing on Jenkins. On my Mac, at least one likes to fail due to the discrepancy between /tmp and /private/tmp. On my Linux VM, I get a rash of failure that make no particular sense to me

Re: Remaining IT failures for MNG-5214

2011-12-10 Thread Benson Margulies
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Dec 10, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> However, in 3043, the consumer leaves out the classifier from the >> dependency specification. Is anyone willing to explain why that bit of >> relaxation was considered a good idea?

Re: Remaining IT failures for MNG-5214

2011-12-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Dec 10, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > However, in 3043, the consumer leaves out the classifier from the > dependency specification. Is anyone willing to explain why that bit of > relaxation was considered a good idea? My inclination would be to > change the test to specify the cl

Remaining IT failures for MNG-5214

2011-12-10 Thread Benson Margulies
5214 notes that Maven will incorrectly resolve type=wsdl to target/classes of a project of type jar. Fixing that broke 3 integration tests. Reading the JIRAs for those tests (3043, 4065, 2871), the upshot is that decisions were made to relax the matching rules for cases where the bug authors and

RE: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC3 staged

2011-12-10 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 Tested it on several mojo-projects and non-java projects with customized default-lifecycle without any problem.I ran into MPIR-137[1] but that seems to be resolved with the fix for Dans issue. -Robert [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-237 > From: ol...@apache.org > Date: Wed, 7 Dec

Re: svn commit: r1212720 - /maven/maven-3/trunk/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/ReactorReader.java

2011-12-10 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi Benson, Author: bimargulies Date: Sat Dec 10 02:22:55 2011 New Revision: 1212720 [...] @@ -156,12 +159,57 @@ class ReactorReader return null; } -private boolean classifierComparison ( String c1, String c2 ) +/** + * Try to satisfy both MNG-4065 and MNG-5214. Consi