Tested on a couple of builds with mostly standard plugins, looks good.
Regards Mirko
--
Sent from my phone
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com
http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/
https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
On Dec 5, 2011 3:28 PM, "Olivier Lamy" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apache Maven 3.0.
Look good to me, the issue reported by me for RC2 is fixed
-Dan
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC3 has been staged for testing purpose (this is a
> preview of the coming 3.0.4 official release)
>
> The repository is available here:
> https://r
the code is in DefaultModelBuilder [1]
Regards,
Hervé
[1] http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.0.4/maven-model-builder/
Le Lundi 5 Décembre 2011 23:31:03 Mark Derricutt a écrit :
> I've not yet looked at maven internal code about how one might implement
> this ( to be honest, at this point in time I'm
On 12/2/11, AK-47 wrote:
> Hi
>
> My question mite be seems a bit older and answered alot, but i couldn't
> satify to what i got a change to read till now.
> My question is why Maven doesn't allow to include any user running util
> classes/jar into compile or package
> as ant and other build tool
Totally agreed, my point was uniqueness and reproducabilty, so 3.0.5 etc.
would be perfect IMO.
Regards Mirko
--
Sent from my phone
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com
http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/
https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
On Dec 5, 2011 3:18 PM, "Stephen Connolly"
wrote:
>
Fair enough. I confused RC with alpha/beta versions we had in the past.
I can't recall if RCs were available from download page, though.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 11-12-05 9:33 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
But we have never made the RCs available from Maven Central.
http://search.maven.org/#search%7C
Well I would say, given the confusion over RCs or not RCs that when you
spin the official build, just build it as 3.0.5 so that there is no
official 3.0.4 and anyone who had one of the first two RCs can be clear
that it was an RC
On 5 December 2011 14:33, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/5 Stephen
2011/12/5 Stephen Connolly :
> Personally, I'd rather burn 3.0.4 and have 3.0.5, 3.0.6, etc
>
> version numbers are cheap...
>
> if anyone asks what happend to 3.0.4, we just say, oh that was not
> released, there's a tag of it in svn, but there are no binaries or source
> distributions because it
But we have never made the RCs available from Maven Central.
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.maven%22%20AND%20a%3A%22maven-core%22
Show me an RC version in that list!
On 5 December 2011 14:30, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
> This approach fails to make the release candida
This approach fails to make the release candidate available to a wider
community. We need to make release candidate builds available for
download and from maven central repository so early adopters can try
them easily. But we also need to have release candidates clearly marked
as such so more cons
Hello,
Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC3 has been staged for testing purpose (this is a
preview of the coming 3.0.4 official release)
The repository is available here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-292
For convenience, binaries have been copied here:
http://people.apache.org/~ola
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Personally, I'd rather burn 3.0.4 and have 3.0.5, 3.0.6, etc
> version numbers are cheap...
> if anyone asks what happend to 3.0.4, we just say, oh that was not
> released, there's a tag of it in svn, but there are no binaries or source
> d
Personally, I'd rather burn 3.0.4 and have 3.0.5, 3.0.6, etc
version numbers are cheap...
if anyone asks what happend to 3.0.4, we just say, oh that was not
released, there's a tag of it in svn, but there are no binaries or source
distributions because it failed for some reason.
On 5 December 20
Hello everybody,
I understand the need to distinguish between these attempts. I now
have a local copy of 3.0.4 on my disc (as well as on some others).
Next month forgetful as I am, I will not know anymore which of the
different 3.0.4 copies was the blessed one. Let alone that the tag in
subversion
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Dependency Plugin, version 2.4
Provides utility goals to work with dependencies like copying,
unpacking, analyzing, resolving and many more.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin
You should specify the version in yo
2011/12/5 Benjamin Bentmann :
>> Author: olamy
>> Date: Mon Dec 5 10:36:32 2011
>> New Revision: 1210403
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1210403&view=rev
>> Log:
>> add core it test for regression found in appassembler with download
>> timestamped SNAPSHOT
>> see
>> http://mail-archive
Author: olamy
Date: Mon Dec 5 10:36:32 2011
New Revision: 1210403
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1210403&view=rev
Log:
add core it test for regression found in appassembler with download timestamped
SNAPSHOT
see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201112.mbox/%3ccapcjjnhj
Profile are supposed to contains "optional" things. AFAIK it is always possible
to disable a profile (-P!profileId). I don't think it is the same for mixins. I
don't see a use case where mixins should be disabled. I even believe it is bad
for build reproducibility.
My 2 cents.
>___
I've not yet looked at maven internal code about how one might implement
this ( to be honest, at this point in time I'm not sure even know WHERE to
look, other than poking around classes named "Profile" :)
So yes - intuition on my part and just logic really.
How adding something like this to the
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Carlos Sanchez, Olivier Lamy, Stephen Connolly
+1 (non binding): Tony Chemit
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub
Thanks Benjamin.
I'm now adding an it test for that.
2011/12/4 :
> Author: bentmann
> Date: Sun Dec 4 21:52:04 2011
> New Revision: 1210240
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1210240&view=rev
> Log:
> o Revised fix from r1151426 which broke the appassembler-maven-plugin
>
> Modified:
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
