Re: New plugin patch-tracker

2011-11-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi Ralph I haven't gotten that far yet. There is one obstacle left to fix, before an api can be extracted, and that is full use of Java 5 generics. That in turn is currently blocked by an issue in Modello, that prevents upgrading to a version of Modello that can generate Java 5 code. Extracting a

Re: Maven shade plugin question

2011-11-21 Thread Trask Stalnaker
Thanks for reviewing and committing the patch. Could you also deploy a new snapshot build to the apache snapshot repository? Thanks, Trask On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Trask Stalnaker wrote: > Thanks so much for the response. I look forward to your review of the > patch. I'm happy to re

Re: New plugin patch-tracker

2011-11-21 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Could it be possible for the plugin to generate to automatically generate lines of code to fix bugs ?? :-D More seriously good job. A really useful service to ease contributions for ASF (and some others) projects. Arnaud On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hello, > > FYI, I

Re: New plugin patch-tracker

2011-11-21 Thread Ralph Goers
Dennis - have you by chance modified the changes plugin so that there is a jar with most of the logic and the plugin? I recently wanted to create a new plugin that used logic from the changes plugin but couldn't see how to do it. Ralph On Nov 21, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > On

Re: New plugin patch-tracker

2011-11-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
2011/11/21 Simone Tripodi : > Salut Olivier! > in one word: GREAT :) > > I just have 2 minor suggestions: > >  * name attachments as `*.patch` done :-) >  * I didn't have a look at the sourcecode already, but please design > the plugin to easily plug other issue tracker (not like the changes > plug

Re: New plugin patch-tracker

2011-11-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2011-11-21 21:55, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Salut Olivier! > in one word: GREAT :) > > I just have 2 minor suggestions: > > * name attachments as `*.patch` > * I didn't have a look at the sourcecode already, but please design > the plugin to easily plug other issue tracker (not like the change

Re: New plugin patch-tracker

2011-11-21 Thread Simone Tripodi
Salut Olivier! in one word: GREAT :) I just have 2 minor suggestions: * name attachments as `*.patch` * I didn't have a look at the sourcecode already, but please design the plugin to easily plug other issue tracker (not like the changes plugin) well done, impressive work! Simo http://people.

New plugin patch-tracker

2011-11-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello, FYI, I have created a new plugin called maven-patch-tracker-plugin in sandbox. Basically, this plugin will generate a diff using the scm provider configured in your pom (note if the pom says svn but you use git svn, you can use -Dscm.providerType=git). Then will create an issue in your con

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Wagon 2.1 (take 2)

2011-11-21 Thread Mark Struberg
tested with a local VM server without problems. +1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Olivier Lamy > To: Maven Developers List > Cc: > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 4:45 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Maven Wagon 2.1 (take 2) > > Hello, > I'd like to release Apache Maven Wa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Wagon 2.1 (take 2)

2011-11-21 Thread John Casey
+1 On 11/21/11 10:45 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hello, > I'd like to release Apache Maven Wagon 2.1. > It looks to be the last step before being able to release core 3.0.4! > > We fixed 3 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=17844&styleName=Text&projectId=10335&Cre

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Wagon 2.1 (take 2)

2011-11-21 Thread Tony Chemit
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:45:43 +0100 Olivier Lamy wrote: +1 (non binding) Viva core 3.0.4 :) Thanks. Tony > Hello, > I'd like to release Apache Maven Wagon 2.1. > It looks to be the last step before being able to release core 3.0.4! > > We fixed 3 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/R

[VOTE] Apache Maven Wagon 2.1 (take 2)

2011-11-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello, I'd like to release Apache Maven Wagon 2.1. It looks to be the last step before being able to release core 3.0.4! We fixed 3 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=17844&styleName=Text&projectId=10335&Create=Create Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/cont

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Wagon 2.1

2011-11-21 Thread John Casey
On 11/20/11 3:54 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hello, > I cancel this vote and will restart a new one on monday. > As I'd like to include two more fixes. > > > > 2011/11/18 Olivier Lamy : >> Hello, >> I'd like to release Apache Maven Wagon 2.1. >> It looks to be the last step before being able to re

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Wagon 2.1

2011-11-21 Thread John Casey
+1 On 11/18/11 12:03 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hello, > I'd like to release Apache Maven Wagon 2.1. > It looks to be the last step before being able to release core 3.0.4! > > We fixed 1 issue: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=17844&styleName=Text&projectId=10335&Create=

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Maven Jar Signer 1.0

2011-11-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Kristian, Stephen, Olivier +1 (non binding): Tony. I will continue the release process. Thanks -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy ---

Re: [site] #evaluate Velocity macro ignored

2011-11-21 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Lukas, there are exactly the issues that would prevent the adoption in apache-commons... :( I need to study an alternative strategy, thanks for your help! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Jar Signer 1.0

2011-11-21 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the screen On 16 Nov 2011 12:40, "Olivier Lamy" wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to release first version of Apache Maven Jar Signer. > This sh

Re: [site] #evaluate Velocity macro ignored

2011-11-21 Thread Lukas Theussl
It's been a while for me but I remember I ran into several issues when trying to upgrade to a newer velocity version, see eg [1]. For the trademark, there has been an attempt to improve the footer customization [2], but I'm not sure how far this went. -Lukas [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/br

Re: [site] #evaluate Velocity macro ignored

2011-11-21 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Lukas! thanks for the clarification, very appreciated! Are you aware of any turnaround? It would be really useful to let users use placeholders inside of $decoration.body.(head|foot)er elements. It is a requirement I have to satisfy in order to let other ASF communities adopt the fluido-skin,