Re: [VOTE] Use aether 1.13 and sisu 2.3.0 as dependencies of Apache Maven

2011-11-16 Thread Barrie Treloar
+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [discuss] graduate fluido-skin from the sandbox

2011-11-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
really appreciated Dennis, thanks a lot!!! all the best! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > All the skin components share on

Re: [discuss] graduate fluido-skin from the sandbox

2011-11-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi All the skin components share one set of versions. The versions are not connected to a single skin component. I have created the versions fluido-1.0 and fluido-1.1. On Wednesday, November 16, 2011, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi again Dennis! > looks like come versions were erroneously associat

Re: [discuss] graduate fluido-skin from the sandbox

2011-11-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi again Dennis! looks like come versions were erroneously associated to fluido-skin, clicking on fluido-skin component[1] there are associated issues from '07... or did I wrongly interpreted? Sorry in advance for the silly question! Simo [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSKINS/component/15253

Re: [discuss] graduate fluido-skin from the sandbox

2011-11-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Dennis!!! thanks a lot for the update, much more than appreciated!!! All the best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > JIR

Re: [discuss] graduate fluido-skin from the sandbox

2011-11-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi JIRA is setup since before https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSKINS And someone has already created a fluido component On Wednesday, November 16, 2011, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > is there any objection on graduating the fluido-skin outside the sandbox? > If there is a (lazy) cons

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Jar Signer 1.0

2011-11-16 Thread Tony Chemit
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:40:04 +0100 Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, Here is my +1 (non-binding) I will do some documentation for it but I remembered tell you that I will do some documentation for it, my bad, No time at the moment, but I will do it (and Devoxx time at the moment :D) > I'd like to re

Re: javax.script (was: [VOTE] Apache Maven Script Interpreter 1.0)

2011-11-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
Good idea to use this javax.script.* API. IMHO Something to change for next release. 2011/11/16 Jesse Glick : > Did you consider using the standard javax.script.* API instead of some or > all of these interfaces? That would permit automatic support for many > languages by just dropping the JAR wit

Re: [VOTE] Use aether 1.13 and sisu 2.3.0 as dependencies of Apache Maven

2011-11-16 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
+1 (binding) Ralph On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hello, > Note as stated here [1], this vote in order to pass need "A majority > of the PMC". > AFAIK, this PMC is 22 people [2] and currently there is only 8 * +1. > > Thanks! > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend: http://coders.t

Re: [discuss] graduate fluido-skin from the sandbox

2011-11-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
cool, moving it right now :) merci beaucoup! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/skins/trunk/ >

Re: [discuss] graduate fluido-skin from the sandbox

2011-11-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/skins/trunk/ 2011/11/16 Simone Tripodi : > Cool :) > now the (silly) question is: which is the proper location? :P > TIA!!! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http:/

Re: [discuss] graduate fluido-skin from the sandbox

2011-11-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
Cool :) now the (silly) question is: which is the proper location? :P TIA!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Go ! > > 2011/11/16 Si

Re: [fluido skin] new staging version

2011-11-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi guys! @Stephen: sorry I didn't already do, going to do it right now! :) @Olivier: the idea of a context, is wonderful, +1! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4

Re: [fluido skin] new staging version

2011-11-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
2011/11/16 Simone Tripodi : > Hi all again! > > @Olivier: sorry for the latency but looks like this is a week I don't > have a lot of time for OSS :( > Anyway, I just published a new version of maven site, applying the > fluido-skin[1] > > What I honestly think, is we need fresh new logos for the s

Re: [discuss] graduate fluido-skin from the sandbox

2011-11-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
Go ! 2011/11/16 Simone Tripodi : > Hi all guys, > is there any objection on graduating the fluido-skin outside the sandbox? > If there is a (lazy) consensus, I would proceed on moving the source > code on the proper branch - do we have to create a component on JIRA > for tracking the issues? > Man

Re: [discuss] graduate fluido-skin from the sandbox

2011-11-16 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Highly appreciated! +1 (non binding) On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > is there any objection on graduating the fluido-skin outside the sandbox? > If there is a (lazy) consensus, I would proceed on moving the source > code on the proper branch - do we have t

[discuss] graduate fluido-skin from the sandbox

2011-11-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, is there any objection on graduating the fluido-skin outside the sandbox? If there is a (lazy) consensus, I would proceed on moving the source code on the proper branch - do we have to create a component on JIRA for tracking the issues? Many thanks in advance, all the best! Simo http:

Re: [fluido skin] new staging version

2011-11-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 16 November 2011 14:53, Simone Tripodi wrote: > @Steve: I'm going to send a message just for asking if there are no > objections, no votes :) > Seriously, just move it out of sandbox... no need to ask... if there was any body who felt strong enough to object and who has a binding veto, they'd

Re: [fluido skin] new staging version

2011-11-16 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all again! @Olivier: sorry for the latency but looks like this is a week I don't have a lot of time for OSS :( Anyway, I just published a new version of maven site, applying the fluido-skin[1] What I honestly think, is we need fresh new logos for the site, if we agree applying this new skin to

Re: [VOTE] Use aether 1.13 and sisu 2.3.0 as dependencies of Apache Maven

2011-11-16 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 binding Dan On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 1:59:18 PM Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hello, > Note as stated here [1], this vote in order to pass need "A majority > of the PMC". > AFAIK, this PMC is 22 people [2] and currently there is only 8 * +1. > > Thanks! > > > Hello, > > > > Since last vote t

Re: [VOTE] Use aether 1.13 and sisu 2.3.0 as dependencies of Apache Maven

2011-11-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello, Note as stated here [1], this vote in order to pass need "A majority of the PMC". AFAIK, this PMC is 22 people [2] and currently there is only 8 * +1. Thanks! -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy [1] http://maven.apache.o

[VOTE] Apache Maven Jar Signer 1.0

2011-11-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I'd like to release first version of Apache Maven Jar Signer. This shared library is an extraction of the code from maven-jarsigner-plugin to sign jars. The goal is to reuse this component in other mojos. Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-198/ Stagin

Re: [fluido skin] new staging version

2011-11-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
no problem. last time i was promoting something from sandbox, i was told just commit it, don't bother with a vote. too many votes can be a bad thing, however as olamy did a vote for scripting, do what ever you want... all i am saying is no vote required to promote from sandbox - Stephen --- Sent

Re: [fluido skin] new staging version

2011-11-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
Cool. Did you manage to have a sample of m.a.o working fine ? 2011/11/15 Simone Tripodi : > Hi all guys, > I just deployed a new version of the sites skin on my personal ASF space[1]. > > What's new: > >  * css/js scripts are now minified in one single css/jss; >  * the code prettifier now works a