Re: fix wagon http lightweight

Hello, Your changes looks good. It will be nice to see those merged back in the ASF community scm. 2011/8/27 nicolas de loof : > I just can't get git svn to work and push my changes to wagon 1.x branch > feel free to pick-up those changes if you like them > > 2011/8/24 nicolas de loof > >> I'm

Re: [DISCUSS] Project local setting.xml

Am 01.08.2011 22:09, schrieb Benson Margulies: > I have several alternative design ideas. > > 0) If you religiously use a repository manager and mirrorOf "*", you > can prevent this rogues from bothering you. Hi, we do this and still have the need to use a settings.xml, for two reasons: - at work,

Re: fix wagon http lightweight

I just can't get git svn to work and push my changes to wagon 1.x branch feel free to pick-up those changes if you like them 2011/8/24 nicolas de loof > I'm testing a fix for WAGON-346 and > WAGON-347 > Before

Re: maven-compiler-plugin problems under java 7

You may be right, however after a quick investigation it looks like these javac changes on JDK7 have been around for a long time ( and evolving ), as far back as 2008: http://blogs.oracle.com/mcimadamore/entry/improving_javac_diagnostics Such is the joy of the only LONG release that Java7 was.

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Deploy Plugin 2.7 and Maven GPG Plugin 1.4

s/not/now/ On 26 August 2011 22:24, Stephen Connolly wrote: > This vote has passed: > > +1 (binding): Stephen, Mark, Olivier > +1 (non-binding): Tony > > I will not proceed with the release. > > On 22 August 2011 11:23, Stephen Connolly > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Combining the two of these because of

Request for review and comment http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5167

There are 2 areas I would like input on. 1: Did I make proper use of logging in maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/execution/DefaultMavenExecutionRequest Populator.java? 2: Is there a better place for the constants than in maven-settings-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/settings/valid

Re: [DISCUSS] Project local setting.xml

Paul Gier wrote: > > I'd like to discuss the possibility of Maven automatically looking for a > project specific settings.xml file [1]. The main use case for this is > to eliminate, or at least reduce, the need to add repositories to the > poms. A setting.xml file could simply be added into scm

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Deploy Plugin 2.7 and Maven GPG Plugin 1.4

well thanks a lot then, you just made my day :-) thanks Benson for clearing this, and Stephen for performing this release Rubén Garat On 08/26/2011 06:43 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Usually 3 binding is enough, so I'm confused. The usual practice if there aren't enough is to leave the vote ope

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Deploy Plugin 2.7 and Maven GPG Plugin 1.4

Usually 3 binding is enough, so I'm confused. The usual practice if there aren't enough is to leave the vote open. I expected that what he meant was 'if there isn't another vote soon, I'm off for the weekend', not 'I give up'. However, I checked the ultimate fact. http://repository.apache.org show

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Deploy Plugin 2.7 and Maven GPG Plugin 1.4

I don't think so, Stephen asked for one more vote, and that vote didn't appear, so I think he wrote what he meant On 08/26/2011 06:33 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Could 'not' perhaps be a typo for 'now'? On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ruben Garat wrote: what does this mean, and how does it

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Deploy Plugin 2.7 and Maven GPG Plugin 1.4

Could 'not' perhaps be a typo for 'now'? On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ruben Garat wrote: > what does this mean, and how does it go from here? > was this a sign of people not caring enough to vote or did someone have > something against the release? > > thanks for any information > > Rubén Gar

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Deploy Plugin 2.7 and Maven GPG Plugin 1.4

what does this mean, and how does it go from here? was this a sign of people not caring enough to vote or did someone have something against the release? thanks for any information Rubén Garat On 08/26/2011 06:24 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: This vote has passed: +1 (binding): Stephen, Mark,

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Deploy Plugin 2.7 and Maven GPG Plugin 1.4

This vote has passed: +1 (binding): Stephen, Mark, Olivier +1 (non-binding): Tony I will not proceed with the release. On 22 August 2011 11:23, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Hi, > > Combining the two of these because of > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MGPG-38 and > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Deploy Plugin 2.7 and Maven GPG Plugin 1.4

2 * 1 2011/8/22 Stephen Connolly : > Hi, > > Combining the two of these because of > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MGPG-38 and > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEPLOY-137 being essentially mirror > features of the same functionality. > > We have solved a number of issues: > > Deploy: > http:/

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Deploy Plugin 2.7 and Maven GPG Plugin 1.4

ping... need one more binding vote... i will wait 1-2 hours max. - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the screen On 22 Aug 2011 11:23, "Stephen Connolly" wrote: > Hi, > > Comb

Re: Compiler plugin release

Yes, I (or someone else, hint hint;) will look through all the issues with patches. Kristian Den 26. aug. 2011 kl. 18:36 skrev Jesse Glick : > On 08/26/2011 01:51 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: >> aiming for a release sometime mid-next week > > Please consider including the fix for MCOMPILER-140

Re: Compiler plugin release

On 08/26/2011 01:51 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: aiming for a release sometime mid-next week Please consider including the fix for MCOMPILER-140 if you cut a release. It has been sitting there with a patch for months with no activity.

Re: maven-compiler-plugin problems under java 7

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > Hi all, > > We noticed the other day that Java 7 has a modified/changed javac output for > error messages which trips up the maven-compiler-plugin so that it doesn't > properly parse the output. > > I then found that someone else had alre