Re: how to tell if a packaging is classpath

2011-07-10 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Benson, Benson Margulies wrote: > In the jxr plugin, I see: > > if ( !"pom".equals( getProject().getPackaging().toLowerCase() ) ) > { > l.addAll( sourceDirs ); > } > > This can't be good, can it? Isn't there some way to tell what are the > classpath packagings? W

how to tell if a packaging is classpath

2011-07-10 Thread Benson Margulies
In the jxr plugin, I see: if ( !"pom".equals( getProject().getPackaging().toLowerCase() ) ) { l.addAll( sourceDirs ); } This can't be good, can it? Isn't there some way to tell what are the classpath packagings?

Re: Get thee to the Core...

2011-07-10 Thread Benson Margulies
I took a run at JXR-88, and ended up creating JXR-89, which claims that aggregation is not functional at all in JXR at the moment. I'd be happy to be proved confused. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > I opened MNG-5119 to track this. We can use the Wiki too [2], if useful at

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Dependency Plugin version 2.3

2011-07-10 Thread Stephen Connolly
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Stephen Connolly, Brian Fox, Mark Struberg, Olivier Lamy, Hervé Boutemy I will promote the artifacts to the central repository. -Stephen On 6 July 2011 14:09, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > http://jira.c

Re: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new > vote, since this one is formally closed? The 72 hour waiting time is a minimum, you can certainly let it go longer (especially when it runs over a weekend when peopl

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Wagon 1.0

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Struberg
Of course I'm sure Benson know this. This was more meant as general info for other committers (because this very helpful page seems not to be widely known. LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 7/10/11, Mark Struberg wrote: > From: Mark Struberg > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Wagon 1.0 > To:

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Wagon 1.0

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Struberg
The best source is always http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html This file is generated from LDAP. LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 7/10/11, Benson Margulies wrote: > From: Benson Margulies > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Wagon 1.0 > To: "Maven Developers List" > Date: Sunday, July

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Wagon 1.0

2011-07-10 Thread Benson Margulies
I suppose that I followed the wrong link to the list. On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > mark's vote is binding fyi > > - Stephen > > --- > Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense > words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swyp

Release of Wagon project version 1.0

2011-07-10 Thread Benson Margulies
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Wagon project, version 1.0 The wagon project provides the standard transports that connect Maven to repositories. http://maven.apache.org/wagon To take advantage of a new version of one of the wagons, you have to configure it as an e

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Wagon 1.0

2011-07-10 Thread Stephen Connolly
mark's vote is binding fyi - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the screen On 10 Jul 2011 19:40, "Benson Margulies" wrote: > Hi, > The vote has passed with the following resul

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Wagon 1.0

2011-07-10 Thread Benson Margulies
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Lucas, Vincent, Olivier +1 (non binding): Mark Struberg I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.o

Re: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Struberg
the vote is active until one closes it. LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 7/10/11, Benson Margulies wrote: > From: Benson Margulies > Subject: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what? > To: "Maven Developers List" > Date: Sunday, July 10, 2011, 5:58 PM > The vote on wagon only attracted two > binding

Re: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello, Should be better now :-) 2011/7/10 Benson Margulies : > The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new > vote, since this one is formally closed? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven

Re: [VOTE] Release Wagon version 1.0

2011-07-10 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2011/7/7 Benson Margulies : > Hi, > > We solved 4 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?atl_token=ACIO-CAVI-QX7G-9IAS|54cb0a05f789c3d1c147937a1867cbad60dfe04a|lin&version=16884&styleName=Text&projectId=10335&Create=Create > > There are still a plenty of issues left in JIRA:

72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Benson Margulies
The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new vote, since this one is formally closed? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org