Re: [VOTE]: release version 21 of the parent POM for maven plugins

Benson Margulies wrote: Hi, We solved 1 issues: ** Improvement * [MPOM-12] - Update maven-plugins to new org.apache.maven:maven-parent:20 The jira for MPOM is now at apache, so in case anybody else is looking for it at codehaus, here's the link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/M

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release org.apache.maven:maven-parent:20

Benson Margulies wrote: Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding):Stephen Connolly, Olivier Lamy, Kristian Rosenvold, Lukas Theussl, Dennis Lundberg, John Casey +1 (not binding): Benson Margulies, Mark Struberg, For the record: my vote is not binding, but Mark's is

[VOTE]: release version 21 of the parent POM for maven plugins

Hi, We solved 1 issues: ** Improvement * [MPOM-12] - Update maven-plugins to new org.apache.maven:maven-parent:20 There are no open JIRAs against the maven-plugins parent. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml?r1=1135900&r2=1135901&diff_format=h Staging repo: https://re

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release org.apache.maven:maven-parent:20

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding):Stephen Connolly, Olivier Lamy, Kristian Rosenvold, Lukas Theussl, Dennis Lundberg, John Casey +1 (not binding): Benson Margulies, Mark Struberg, I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. -

[VOTE RESULT] Release maven shared parent version 20

Looks like 8*+1, and nothing else. So the vote to release org.apache.maven:maven-parent version 20 passes. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:41 PM, John Casey wrote: > +1 > > On 6/13/11 4:07 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: >> >> it is custom to include the viewcvs diff link when voting on the >> release of o

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Enforcer Plugin version 1.0.1

Hi, I assume that this is only a problem based on the sync...but on the page: http://people.apache.org/~brianf/enforcer-stage/plugins/maven-enforcer-plugin/plugin-info.html the link "Standard rules" contains a link which produces an "Not found!"... Also the "Custom Rules" -> "Writing a custom r

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Enforcer Plugin version 1.0.1

Hi, Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-011/ Staging site: (Sync pending) http://people.apache.org/~brianf/enforcer-stage/plugins/maven-enforcer-plugin/ I assume that this is only a problem based on the sync...but on the page: http://people.apache.org/~brian

[VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.9

Hi, We solved 17 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541&version=17312 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+SUREFIRE+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+up

[VOTE] Release Maven Verifier version 1.3

Hi, We solved/improved quite a few things. Issue tracking does not seem to be actively used for this project, svn log attached below Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-012/ Staging site: (Sync pending) http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-verifier-1.3/ Guid

[VOTE] Release Maven Remote Resources Plugin version 1.2.1

Hi, We solved 1 issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11391&version=17198 There are still 2 issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MRRESOURCES+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+updated+DES

[VOTE] Release Maven Enforcer Plugin version 1.0.1

Hi, We solved 2 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530&version=16879 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MENFORCER+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+up

Re: [VOTE] Release maven shared parent version 20

+1 On 6/13/11 4:07 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: it is custom to include the viewcvs diff link when voting on the release of one of the parent poms. In this case here is the link: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml?r1=1134934&r2=1069626&diff_format=h On 12 June 2011 16:3

Re: [VOTE] Release maven shared parent version 20

+1 To avoid confusion in the future, please don't use the word "shared" when releasing maven-parent. We have a parent for our shared components as well... On 2011-06-12 17:31, Benson Margulies wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 1 issues: > > ** Improvement > * [MPOM-11] - Update to compile with/for

Re: [REDUX] Java Service Wrappers (JSW) unfortunate license change

Mark, without being a lawyer, my guess is that you mean "no one can sue you successfully", as opposed to "no one can sue you". And I'm sure that any reasonable person would try to avoid even the former. Jochen On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > No Robert! > > Even in the U

Another problem plexus child: CachedMap

I asked the author about this. His response is below. I propose to just copy the source into the bridge. It's an acceptable license small quantity inclusion (the friendly BSD version). Clean-rooming a new version with the same bugs does not strike me as reasonable. Hi, CachedMap was provided in ol

License Management [WAS Re: [REDUX] Java Service Wrappers (JSW) unfortunate license change]

(Apoligies for allowing this to drifting off topic after I failed to make my main point) IMHO bait-and-switch licensing isn't something to panic about today but better license management is something that Maven should think about enabling. This would offer users protection from similar tactics in

Re: [REDUX] Java Service Wrappers (JSW) unfortunate license change

No Robert! Even in the UK after enforcing a few cracy things recently, no one can sue you for downloading something in good faith. Of course they can force you to not use it in the future - like everywhere else. LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 6/14/11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > From: Robert

Re: [REDUX] Java Service Wrappers (JSW) unfortunate license change

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > The legal risk involved in downloading and using a jar of code pushed > to central under false pretenses is very small. I live in the UK. That's now untrue here. Robert ---

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Indexer version 4.1.1

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Mark Struberg, Hervé Boutemy, Olivier Lamy, Brett Porter +1 (non binding): Jesse Glick, Brian Demers, Damian Bradicich I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Thanks, ~t~ -