+0.
Even if it could be the best for us to have coherent systems such migration
is very difficult to do as Jira provides very few things to do such changes.
The export/import by project isn't transitive with all Jira internal
elements (users, groups, workflows, schemes ).
It is AFAIK very diff
On 1 June 2011 14:46, Brett Porter wrote:
> On 01/06/2011, at 8:21 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>> REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Potential migration of Maven's JIRA from
>> jira.codehaus.org to issues.apache.org
>>
>> Just wondering now that codehaus and apache are on nearly similar
>> versions (4.1.2 an
On 1 June 2011 14:46, Brett Porter wrote:
> On 01/06/2011, at 8:21 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>> REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Potential migration of Maven's JIRA from
>> jira.codehaus.org to issues.apache.org
>>
>> Just wondering now that codehaus and apache are on nearly similar
>> versions (4.1.2 an
On 01/06/2011, at 8:21 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Potential migration of Maven's JIRA from
> jira.codehaus.org to issues.apache.org
>
> Just wondering now that codehaus and apache are on nearly similar
> versions (4.1.2 and 4.2.4 respectively) what would be involved.
>
>
Hello,
I have taken over maintainership of a plugin called maven-car-plugin.
Recently, I added a site lifecycle for this plugin, with a pre-site and
a site phase.
The problem is that when I call "mvn site", between the pre-site and the
site phase, maven decides to run the string of generate
Wearing an Apache Member hat (in no particular order)
1) IP. Patches at Apache JIRA are more clearly contributed to the foundation.
2) Appearances: Maven is an Apache project. As part of brand
management, it's infrastructure should be at Apache.
3) Interdependencies to other Apache project. We sho
well, you had 1 point under +1 and two points under -1, so that's one
more under -1... ;)
I understand that this is not a vote, simply my opinion. I just don't
see the point of going through all this hassle if the only gain is to be
hosted on different hardware. What's wrong with codehaus? W
Can you please iterate your cons...
I want to summarize at the end and then the PMC will decide what the
next action is
On 1 June 2011 11:39, Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
>
> I see more cons than pros, plus: potential trouble, potential confusion,
> lots of hassle.
>
> -1
>
> -Lukas
>
>
> Stephen Conn
I see more cons than pros, plus: potential trouble, potential confusion,
lots of hassle.
-1
-Lukas
Stephen Connolly wrote:
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Potential migration of Maven's JIRA from
jira.codehaus.org to issues.apache.org
Just wondering now that codehaus and apache are on nearly simil
Agree.
BTW we have to think to migrate some linked projects (Archiva MRM,
Continuum CONTINUUM).
And if we could have the same keys (MNG, SCM etc), Ben could maybe add
a rewrite or redirect rule to help users going to jira @asf.
The only trouble I see is watchers,reporters who doesn't exists @asf.
This is not a vote BTW
On 1 June 2011 11:25, Mark Struberg wrote:
> +1
>
> the problem with cross referencing already exists on the other side too. I
> e.g. cannot link from a WAGON-329 (hosted at codehaus atm) to FTPSERVER-413
> (hosted at apache).
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Wed, 6/1/11,
+1
the problem with cross referencing already exists on the other side too. I e.g.
cannot link from a WAGON-329 (hosted at codehaus atm) to FTPSERVER-413 (hosted
at apache).
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 6/1/11, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> From: Stephen Connolly
> Subject: [RFC] Migrating Mave
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS: Potential migration of Maven's JIRA from
jira.codehaus.org to issues.apache.org
Just wondering now that codehaus and apache are on nearly similar
versions (4.1.2 and 4.2.4 respectively) what would be involved.
Ben@codehaus can give us a 4.1.2 dump of the entire codehaus jira
The plexus compiler does not handle the javac -Werror option correctly, it's
extremely important for production builds. A entry was made in Jira here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOMPILER-120
The fix to this issue is a trivial code change, I posted of patch over two
weeks ago but nobody repli
14 matches
Mail list logo
