you have the same as brett and me.
- Stephen
---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the
screen
On 26 May 2011 21:33, "Arnaud Héritier" wrote:
> I don't remember which level of admin I hav
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (24 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
Hmm. We get email at CXF from a query that queries for attachments.
Apparently the ASF version has acquired this trick.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MAHOUT+AND+status+%3D+Open+AND+%22Attachment+count%22+%3C%3D+%221000%22+AND+%22Attachmen
On 27/05/2011, at 9:01 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I think this is just supposed to be a mechanism to attract committer
> attention. I think it's silly: at CXF, we just use 'any attachments?'
> for that purpose. I only wanted to set the bit in case someone was
> really watching.
The problem is
I think this is just supposed to be a mechanism to attract committer
attention. I think it's silly: at CXF, we just use 'any attachments?'
for that purpose. I only wanted to set the bit in case someone was
really watching.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:29 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
wrote:
> Ra
Rats - I should have looked at Jira before posting. I was thinking this was
the checkbox to accept the license.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:23 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com <
ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> The patch bit should be done away with. It would be much better to just
> have a stat
The patch bit should be done away with. It would be much better to just have
a statement that says everything contributed is under the Apache license
with a link to the license.
2011/5/26 Arnaud Héritier
> I don't remember which level of admin I have on this instance but if we
> want to allow to
On 26 May 2011 15:03, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> On 26 May 2011 12:57, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 25 May 2011 10:04, Stephen Connolly
>> wrote:
>> > These were Nicolas' tests, but a good catch and I've made the change.
>> >
>> > BTW, the aim here is to reproduce the bugs for the first go... so if
>> > P
I don't remember which level of admin I have on this instance but if we want to
allow to edit this field I think we need to edit the edition view. There is no
fine grained security settings for jira fields edition. Thus it is for all
people who can edit the issue or nobody.
Le 26 mai 2011 à 18
may or may not be done
On 26 May 2011 15:22, Benson Margulies wrote:
> The access control on codehaus jira is quite restrictive. In
> particular, issue authors aren't permitted to 'edit'. Which means,
> that if you create an issue, and *later* attach a patch, you can't set
> the 'patch' bit.
>
>
> The only way I can consider of testing this reliably is to keep the test
> code using platform encoding and have two executions of surefire, the first
> leaving things as is and the second with file.encoding set to a different
> value.
For http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-740 I had to u
The access control on codehaus jira is quite restrictive. In
particular, issue authors aren't permitted to 'edit'. Which means,
that if you create an issue, and *later* attach a patch, you can't set
the 'patch' bit.
Now, if there is ever a 'long march' of jiras from codehaus to asf for
maven, this
On 26 May 2011 12:57, sebb wrote:
> On 25 May 2011 10:04, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
> > These were Nicolas' tests, but a good catch and I've made the change.
> >
> > BTW, the aim here is to reproduce the bugs for the first go... so if
> > Plexus Utils is incorrectly using platform encoding then
On 25 May 2011 10:04, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> These were Nicolas' tests, but a good catch and I've made the change.
>
> BTW, the aim here is to reproduce the bugs for the first go... so if
> Plexus Utils is incorrectly using platform encoding then actually the
> test would be correct! So it may
14 matches
Mail list logo
