I sent notices out to the users lists and updated the ticket. You should
probably co-ordinate with Tony who has the ball on that.
- Brett
On 25/05/2011, at 11:52 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
> If no one objects to collapsing all the commits lists into
> comm...@maven.apache.org by tomorrow mor
If no one objects to collapsing all the commits lists into
comm...@maven.apache.org by tomorrow morning my time (Eastern US), I'll
declare lazy consensus and go ahead and do it. Thus, speak up now if you
object. :-)
I don't have access to do anything about the dev/users lists.
Dan
On Tue
On 5/25/11 3:48 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
On 25 May 2011 08:04, Jörg Schaible wrote:
John Casey wrote:
On 5/24/11 8:25 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
2011/5/24 Arnaud Héritier:
Before talking about a specific change in the model like the addition of
mixins (which may be cool but not critical) d
Hi folks!
I now upgraded wagon to use the latest plexus-maven-plugin.
This was of course not friction free because the 'decriptor' goal got moved
from the process-resouces phase to process-classes. This means that the
'merge-descriptors' goal - which is still triggered in process-resources -
Thanks.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Dennis Lundberg
wrote:
> I'll take a look at them.
>
> On Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Tonight I submitted a little raft of jiras with patches for the
>> maven-changes-plugin. I have some hope that they will prove
>> digestible.
>>
FYI
here is my thinking on the release plan
first release will shade all the commons-* stuff inside so that we
don't conflict with anyone using older versions of commons-* and
should be 100% compatibile (warts and all) with plexus-utils
for the second release we will add a MethodRule that flips
Fun to know we will have to hack commons-io to backport plexus-utils bugs ;)
2011/5/25 Stephen Connolly
> These were Nicolas' tests, but a good catch and I've made the change.
>
> BTW, the aim here is to reproduce the bugs for the first go... so if
> Plexus Utils is incorrectly using platform en
These were Nicolas' tests, but a good catch and I've made the change.
BTW, the aim here is to reproduce the bugs for the first go... so if
Plexus Utils is incorrectly using platform encoding then actually the
test would be correct! So it may be that we revert this... should
probably add an annotat
Not sure if this actually would change much.
I've looked at the activity reports in markmail and it seems that most of those
lists are almost dead anyway.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 5/25/11, Brett Porter wrote:
> From: Brett Porter
> Subject: Re: drop wagon-users list?
> To: "Maven Developers
notice that encoding (US-ASCII or UTF-8) should be precised both when
converting String to byte[] and byte[] to String, or you're implicitely using
platform encoding which is not the best: if anybody tries to run tests on an
EBCDIC platform, they will fail (I know, this is quite rare, but that's
Brett Porter wrote:
I updated the INFRA ticket to cover the users& dev lists too, in line with the
rest of the thread.
Question: what do we do with the *-users@ lists? I don't think it's appropriate
to merge those people into users@maven list. Should they come to dev@, or just
announce it
I updated the INFRA ticket to cover the users & dev lists too, in line with the
rest of the thread.
Question: what do we do with the *-users@ lists? I don't think it's appropriate
to merge those people into users@maven list. Should they come to dev@, or just
announce it is being shutdown and le
On 25 May 2011 08:04, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> John Casey wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 5/24/11 8:25 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
>>> 2011/5/24 Arnaud Héritier:
Before talking about a specific change in the model like the addition of
mixins (which may be cool but not critical) did we :
- studied that
I'll take a look at them.
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Tonight I submitted a little raft of jiras with patches for the
> maven-changes-plugin. I have some hope that they will prove
> digestible.
>
> I would be very grateful if someone could take them on. If we can make
>
For tests, I typically use slf4j-simple. Relying on the slf4j-api is enough for
compile-time - the user can declare their preferred implementation.
On 25/05/2011, at 5:03 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Guess there is a lot room for improvement ;)
> I was trying to get my debug logs running but sinc
what I somehow would like to prevent is that we have 2 editable files lying
around. That would end up in different people editing them independently which
would never go in sync again.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 5/25/11, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> From: Jörg Schaible
> Subject: Re: POM 4+ was R
John Casey wrote:
>
>
> On 5/24/11 8:25 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
>> 2011/5/24 Arnaud Héritier:
>>> Before talking about a specific change in the model like the addition of
>>> mixins (which may be cool but not critical) did we :
>>> - studied that we had everything necessary to manage new versions o
Guess there is a lot room for improvement ;)
I was trying to get my debug logs running but since jul logging didnt give me
anything I tried to add logback.
What is the prefered way to log nowadays? Back then it was commons-logging
under the shelf, but what is suggested now?
Is there an example
18 matches
Mail list logo
