tested on maven-site-plugin-3.x: fixes MSITE-506, which IT failed on Maven
3.0.2
+1
Hervé
Le lundi 28 février 2011, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to those who tested the RC, I think we can move on to the real
> thing now.
>
> We solved 29 issues since 3.0.2:
> http://jira.codeh
You could define the goal only, like
net.innig.sweetxml
sweetxml-maven
convert-resources
+1
Thanks,
- Fabrice
belling...@apache.org
fabrice.belling...@sonarsource.com
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to those who tested the RC, I think we can move on to the real thing
> now.
>
> We solved 29 issues since 3.
+1
Thanks!
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
2011/2/28 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to those who tested the RC, I think we can move on to the real thing
> now.
>
> We solved 29 issues since 3.0.2:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
+1
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 17:58, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to those who tested the RC, I think we can move on to the real thing
> now.
>
> We solved 29 issues since 3.0.2:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=17061
>
> There are still a cou
I have looked at those options currently I am using the 7c option of
invoking the maven gpg plugin with sign-and-deploy from ant but that has
the problems that I indicated in the first mail, and is not as friendly
to add to an ant build as just using the maven ant tasks like
artifact:deploy
O
Did you have a look at 7b or 7c of this usage guide? One of these should be
a fit for you!
/Anders
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 15:19, Ruben Garat wrote:
> Hi, I am already using oss.sonatype.org and following this guide. But this
> are projects that are not using maven, they use ant and have no inte
Hi, I am already using oss.sonatype.org and following this guide. But
this are projects that are not using maven, they use ant and have no
interest to move their build process to maven, even though they are
willing to make the effort to get their libraries released into maven
central.
I think
+1
Thanks !
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
2011/2/28 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to those who tested the RC, I think we can move on to the real thing
> now.
>
> We solved 29 issues since 3.0.2:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa