On 2011-02-14 18:13, Brian Fox wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
>>
>>
>> Brian Fox wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Dennis Lundberg
>>> wrote:
On 2011-02-14 01:51, Brian Fox wrote:
>
> Based on the initial discussion, I'm going to ca
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
>
> Brian Fox wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Dennis Lundberg
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2011-02-14 01:51, Brian Fox wrote:
Based on the initial discussion, I'm going to cancel this vote and
restage the ASF one with s
Brian Fox wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2011-02-14 01:51, Brian Fox wrote:
Based on the initial discussion, I'm going to cancel this vote and
restage the ASF one with source/target at 1.5 and roll back the site
plugin to the 2.0.x version unless there are
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-02-14 01:51, Brian Fox wrote:
>> Based on the initial discussion, I'm going to cancel this vote and
>> restage the ASF one with source/target at 1.5 and roll back the site
>> plugin to the 2.0.x version unless there are objections.
Hello,
I am re-using the Maven HG provider in a project where I need to
process all commits. I have a problem with the changelog command.
Mercurial reports the revision under the following form:
996:dfec0866dab97b8b5b949a6b16a70181a90deeb0
The first part is a number which is only valid for the lo
I posted patches for MDEP-107 couple of weeks ago and I really hope they'd
get to the 2.2 train as well if that's what you have in mind next. They
wouldn't have an impact on dependency analyzer
--
Tuomas
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/vote-release-maven-depend
