Brian,
Do you still plan to publish the staging repo for maven-dependency-plugin?
-Dan
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
> +1
>
> -Lukas
>
>
> Brian Fox wrote:
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-055/
>>
>> This release fixes MDE
Hello,
I wonder if we could have some documentation in the javadoc of
EventSpy for the method :
void onEvent( Object event )
throws Exception;
Because without navigating in the code it's a little bit mysterious to
know what type of events are "monitored" here.
Thanks
--
Olivier Lamy
+1
-Lukas
Brian Fox wrote:
Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-055/
This release fixes MDEP-143, MDEP-149, MDEP-262 and is required by the
Maven Dependency Plugin 2.2
Vote is open for 72 hours
--
+1 to all
-Lukas
Brian Fox wrote:
Each parent has a bunch of changes, but mostly the changes fall into 2
categories:
1) mundane updating of new plugin versions to use
2) preparations to make Maven3 builds use the correct site plugin
ASF Parent:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/
WOO WOO!!! Nice one :-)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> This is not set in the POM but the default is 1.5 now:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-compiler-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/AbstractCompilerMojo.java
-Jesse
--
There are
After
executing ‘mvn sonar:sonar –X’ I get the following
„[ERROR]
Failed to execute goal org.codehaus.mojo:cobertura-maven-plugin:2.4:inst
rument (default-cli) on project GlobeEJB115: Unable to instrument
project. -> [Help 1]
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException:
Failed
On 9 February 2011 14:28, Brian Fox wrote:
> Here's a workaround in the meantime:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml?p2=%2Fmaven%2Fpom%2Ftrunk%2Fasf%2Fpom.xml&p1=%2Fmaven%2Fpom%2Ftrunk%2Fasf%2Fpom.xml&r1=1065778&r2=1065777&view=diff&pathrev=1065778
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 a
After
executing ‘mvn sonar:sonar –X’ I get the following
„[ERROR]
Failed to execute goal
org.codehaus.mojo:cobertura-maven-plugin:2.4:inst
rument (default-cli) on project GlobeEJB115: Unable to instrument
project. -> [H
My key hasn't changed in at least 1.5 years so it should be out there.
It's also in the KEYs file in svn.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> All the key servers were whacked a couple days ago, maybe they still are. I
> couldn't find anything either a couple days ago but I th
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Feb 11, 2011, at 7:54 AM, Jesse Farinacci wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This parent POM like any other parent POM provides default values, i.e.
>>> something that proje
On Feb 11, 2011, at 7:54 AM, Jesse Farinacci wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
> wrote:
>>
>> This parent POM like any other parent POM provides default values, i.e.
>> something that projects can override as they see fit. Correct me if I'm
>> mistaken,
All the key servers were whacked a couple days ago, maybe they still are. I
couldn't find anything either a couple days ago but I thought it was fixed.
On Feb 11, 2011, at 7:03 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> in which key server did Brian serve his pub key? Wasn't able to find it...
>
> LieGrue,
> s
2011/2/11 Jesse Farinacci
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:58 AM, nicolas de loof
> wrote:
> > It does, since version 2.3, but the version set by super-pom is more
> > conservative
> > Maybe you suggested Apache POM should set a recent compiler plugin
> version ?
>
> Check http://svn.apache.o
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
> Brian,
>
> I am happy about this :) however site-plugin-2.2 uses doxia-1.1 and has a
> prereq of maven 2.2, I seem to remember some resistance last time to use it
> by default. Is this no issue anymore?
>
I didn't bump it to 2.2, Olivier d
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:58 AM, nicolas de loof
wrote:
> It does, since version 2.3, but the version set by super-pom is more
> conservative
> Maybe you suggested Apache POM should set a recent compiler plugin version ?
Check http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml?view=mar
That was my plan but I ran into a test issue restaging mdep that I
wanted to look into
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
> oops sorry, You already did that
>
> -Dan
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
>> Perhaps, you can stage both of them together. It is easier t
>
>
> By that logic, which I happen to agree with, then shouldn't the
> compiler plugin start using 1.5 by default then?
>
It does, since version 2.3, but the version set by super-pom is more
conservative
Maybe you suggested Apache POM should set a recent compiler plugin version ?
Nicolas
>
> -
Greetings,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
>
> This parent POM like any other parent POM provides default values, i.e.
> something that projects can override as they see fit. Correct me if I'm
> mistaken, but I'm under the impression that Site Plugin 2.2 is generally an
Brian Fox wrote:
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheapache-053/
+1
All 3 staged at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-054/
+1
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
forget it, found it now.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 2/11/11, Mark Struberg wrote:
> From: Mark Struberg
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1069761 - /maven/project/KEYS
> To: dev@maven.apache.org
> Date: Friday, February 11, 2011, 12:03 PM
> in which key server did Brian serve
> his pub key? Wasn't a
in which key server did Brian serve his pub key? Wasn't able to find it...
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 2/11/11, bentm...@apache.org wrote:
> From: bentm...@apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1069761 - /maven/project/KEYS
> To: comm...@maven.apache.org
> Date: Friday, February 11, 2011, 11:46 AM
Perhaps we should add some docs on apache site to recommend to
projects to use at least 2.2.1 or 3.0.x ?
I'm not sure we have such guidelines about Maven for Apache projects ?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
>> however site-plugin-2.2 uses doxia
Hi all,
sorry it took so long to reply, but here are my findings:
> I remember when I was writing that plugin I found a couple of use cases
for
> tool chains that the initial spec had missed... there could be some hack
I'm
> doing... also are you using maven 2 or 3.
I am using Maven 3; while an
Lukas Theussl wrote:
however site-plugin-2.2 uses doxia-1.1 and has
a prereq of maven 2.2, I seem to remember some resistance last time to
use it by default. Is this no issue anymore?
This parent POM like any other parent POM provides default values, i.e.
something that projects can override
Brian,
I am happy about this :) however site-plugin-2.2 uses doxia-1.1 and has
a prereq of maven 2.2, I seem to remember some resistance last time to
use it by default. Is this no issue anymore?
I'd also appreciate some explanations concerning your comment in the
vote thread 'preparations t
25 matches
Mail list logo
