Re: Building the assembly plugin doc

2010-12-13 Thread Benson Margulies
Yes, I did run site:site. It's a habit of mine from aggregated projects. Thanks for the hint. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 14/12/2010, at 12:39 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> I just submitted a patchlet for some of the doc in the assembly plugin. > > Thanks! > >>

Re: Building the assembly plugin doc

2010-12-13 Thread Brett Porter
On 14/12/2010, at 12:39 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I just submitted a patchlet for some of the doc in the assembly plugin. Thanks! > > I can't find any combination of maven version and goals that will > build a complete doc for the plugin. Some of the files derived from > the modello files

Building the assembly plugin doc

2010-12-13 Thread Benson Margulies
I just submitted a patchlet for some of the doc in the assembly plugin. I can't find any combination of maven version and goals that will build a complete doc for the plugin. Some of the files derived from the modello files just never get generated. There's also this annoying blacklisted codehaus

Re: FEATURE: maven-help-plugin:describe to display Required and Expression status?

2010-12-13 Thread Guo Du
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > If you think this is a required feature, please file an issue in the > corresponding JIRA (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPH). > This is typically how feature request have to go through. Ticket created with patch against trunk: http://ji

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-13 Thread Brian Fox
If x-SNAPSHOT.release() = x then SNAPSHOT.release()= npe or divide by zero, take your pick :) I always made sure to point out this anti-pattern during all the maven training classes I did. --mobile On Dec 13, 2010, at 6:42 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Brett Porter wrote: > >> [...] "SNAPSHOT

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-13 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Baptise, Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > 2010/12/13 Jörg Schaible > >> Hi Benjamin, >> >> Benjamin Bentmann wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > as part of MNG-4893 [0] an inconsistency in the way a version string is >> > treated as a snapshot or release was detected. In short, the issue is >> > about what

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-13 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
2010/12/13 Jörg Schaible > Hi Benjamin, > > Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > as part of MNG-4893 [0] an inconsistency in the way a version string is > > treated as a snapshot or release was detected. In short, the issue is > > about what suffix exactly marks a snapshot version. > > > >

Maven Plugin Development - mvn release:prepare

2010-12-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi to all, currently i'm working on a plugin which will check the entries in the POM to be sure some of them have more or less good values...(cause we have faced ofter problems with that). In particular scm (developerConnection and connection)...I currently simply check against svn info outp

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-13 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Benjamin, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > as part of MNG-4893 [0] an inconsistency in the way a version string is > treated as a snapshot or release was detected. In short, the issue is > about what suffix exactly marks a snapshot version. > > The current intention is to revise the logic

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-13 Thread Brett Porter
On 13/12/2010, at 10:41 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Brett Porter wrote: > >> [...] "SNAPSHOT" (with no leading version) was valid, but that behaviour has >> long been (unofficially) deprecated. > > Do you have some more pointers for this deprecation handy? No - that's what I meant by unof

Re: Cleanup to SNAPSHOT version handling

2010-12-13 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brett Porter wrote: [...] "SNAPSHOT" (with no leading version) was valid, but that behaviour has long been (unofficially) deprecated. Do you have some more pointers for this deprecation handy? Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-