In my defense, I was busy coding a plugin when I posed the question.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> You're probably better using the available plugin expressions for the
> execution root rather than this.
>
> Also, the users@ list is the right place to ask the original qu
I think the original reason the logic is how it is was because just "SNAPSHOT"
(with no leading version) was valid, but that behaviour has long been
(unofficially) deprecated.
On 11/12/2010, at 4:18 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as part of MNG-4893 [0] an inconsistency in the way a ve
You're probably better using the available plugin expressions for the execution
root rather than this.
Also, the users@ list is the right place to ask the original question :)
Cheers,
Brett
On 12/12/2010, at 11:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
Hi,
If you think this is a required feature, please file an issue in the
corresponding JIRA (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPH).
This is typically how feature request have to go through.
Cheers
2010/12/12 Guo Du
> maven-help-plugin:2.1.1:describe with maven 3.0.1 doesn't show the
> parameter
+1. I guess it's OSGi related.
Though I don't do that anymore, since we don't do OSGi anymore too, I've
already done that some years ago.
In fact, I guess this was because it was not totally clear that Maven suffix
had to be -SNAPSHOT and not SNAPSHOT only.
At that time, we were trying to have an
