+1
Signatures are good on src and bin tgz, built from source and confirmed ITs
pass locally.
- Brett
On 23/11/2010, at 10:18 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> h
+1
I haven't looked at the code in detail, but the signature is good, the build &
tests succeed, and it passes a RAT check.
On 24/11/2010, at 6:06 AM, Brian Demers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the initial release after moving the indexer to apache. Also
> included in this staging repo are changes
On Nov 24, 2010, at 6:19 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 25/11/2010, at 12:12 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 24, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not against any of the changes you made and it is my fault for not
>>> noticing earlier. As a general rule I don't believe
Hi,
With the release coming up, I realised we'd need a JIRA project beyond that. I
can create it... should it be MINDEXER?
Did anyone have plans to import existing issues, or just start fresh?
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
---
+1 apache parent
+1 maven parent
+1 to the resources change
On 25/11/2010, at 9:20 AM, Brian Demers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Included in this staging repo are:
> apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor - 1.0.3
> Added support for projects to (optionally) create source zip and tar
> bundles.
> apache
On 25/11/2010, at 12:12 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Nov 24, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>> I'm not against any of the changes you made and it is my fault for not
>> noticing earlier. As a general rule I don't believe the Apache pom should
>> contain alpha or beta releases.
>
>
On Nov 24, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I'm not against any of the changes you made and it is my fault for not
> noticing earlier. As a general rule I don't believe the Apache pom should
> contain alpha or beta releases.
I would say they can't. You potentially destabilize someone's e
I'm not against any of the changes you made and it is my fault for not noticing
earlier. As a general rule I don't believe the Apache pom should contain alpha
or beta releases. If the artifacts are good enough to be included in the Apache
pom then they should be good enough for a "real" release.
I'm +1 on the maven-indexer. I'll followup with the apache parent on the other
thread.
Ralph
On Nov 24, 2010, at 2:13 PM, Brian Demers wrote:
> There were a couple simple changes to the asf pom:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml?r1=1037038&r2=1038247
> http://svn.apache
Hi,
Included in this staging repo are:
apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor - 1.0.3
Added support for projects to (optionally) create source zip and tar
bundles.
apache parent - 8
Consumed apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor 1.0.3
Upgraded version of the gpg plugin to 1.1
http://
There were a couple simple changes to the asf pom:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml?r1=1037038&r2=1038247
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/trunk/asf/pom.xml?r1=944805&r2=1036989
I am going to keep this vote going, but start another for the parent poms
(and apache-sour
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Hervé Boutemy, Lukas Theussl, Vincent Siveton, Dennis Lundberg
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Thanks to everyone who voted!
On 2010-11-21 22:12, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 5 issues:
> http://j
+1 from me
On 2010-11-21 22:12, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 5 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761&styleName=Html&version=16051
>
> There are still no issues left in JIRA!
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories
+1
Flexmojos is perfectly happy with it
VELO
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> +1
>
> Vincent
>
> 2010/11/23 Benjamin Bentmann :
> > Hi,
> >
> > 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
> the
> > real thing.
> >
> > We solved 21 issues sinc
+1
Vincent
2010/11/23 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16331
>
> There are still a couple of issues l
+1 (non-binding)
/Paul
Quoting Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
> the real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16
> 331
>
> There are still a co
+1
- Olivier
2010/11/23 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16331
>
> There are still a couple of issues
+1
-Lukas
On 11/23/2010 12:18 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do
the real thing.
We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16331
There are still a couple of is
+1
Emmanuel
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 3.0.1-RC1 seems to be fine, thanks to those who tested it. So let's do the
> real thing.
>
> We solved 21 issues since 3.0:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId
19 matches
Mail list logo
